Use of Fracture Mechanics and Shape Optimization for Component Designs

About half of mechanical failures are due to repeated loading. Most of the failures are fatigue related, and the fatigue prohlem has been of major concern in the design of structures. The failure is a function of, among other factors, the external loads, material behavior, geometry of the structure, and crack characteristics. The relationship between structural geometry and number of life cycles to failure is investigated to improve the fatigue life of structural components. The linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach is integrated with shape optimal design methodology. The primary ohjective of the design problem is to enhance the life of the structure. The results from LEFM analyses are used in the fatigue model to predict the life of the structure before failure is deemed to have occurred. The shape of the structure is changed using the natural shape optimal design methodology. Gradient-based nonlinear programming techniques are used with the computed sensitivity information to predict the required shape changes. Relevant issues such as problem formulation, finite element modeling, mesh generation, and regeneration are discussed. Two design examples are solved, and the results show that, with proper shape changes, the life of structural systems subjected to fatigue loads can be enhanced significantly.

[1]  A R Rosenfield,et al.  THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF FRACTURE IN THE UNITED STATES: PART 2 - A REPORT TO THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS BY BATTELLE COLUMBUS LABORATORIES , 1983 .

[2]  Paul A. Wawrzynek,et al.  An algorithm to generate quadrilateral or triangular element surface meshes in arbitrary domains with applications to crack propagation , 1995 .

[3]  R. D. Henshell,et al.  CRACK TIP FINITE ELEMENTS ARE UNNECESSARY , 1975 .

[4]  Subramaniam Rajan,et al.  Topologically-based adaptive mesh generator for shape optimal design , 1991 .

[5]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the quarter‐point crack tip element , 1984 .

[6]  C. Shih,et al.  Relationships between the J-integral and the crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks , 1981 .

[7]  H. O. Fuchs,et al.  Metal fatigue in engineering , 2001 .

[8]  U. S. Fernando,et al.  INFLUENCE OF CONTACT LOADING ON FRETTING FATIGUE BEHAVIOUR , 1994 .

[9]  S. Chan,et al.  On the Finite Element Method in Linear Fracture Mechanics , 1970 .

[10]  J. Kaleta,et al.  Representation of cyclic properties and hysteresis energy in α-brass using a certain class of elastic-plastic models , 1994 .

[11]  Ji-Ho Song.  Growth and Closure of Short Fatigue Cracks , 1985 .

[12]  R. Barsoum.  On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics , 1976 .

[13]  G. Vanderplaats,et al.  Structural optimization by methods of feasible directions. , 1973 .

[14]  L. P. Harrop.  The optimum size of quarter‐point crack tip elements , 1982 .

[15]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[16]  Subramaniam Rajan,et al.  Shape optimal design using fictitious loads , 1989 .

[17]  P. Reimers.  Simulation of mixed mode fatigue crack growth , 1991 .

[18]  G. Zoutendijk,et al.  Methods of Feasible Directions , 1962, The Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  A. Belegundu,et al.  A shape optimization approach based on natural design variables and shape functions , 1988 .

[20]  Hartmut Noltemeier,et al.  Geometric Modelling , 1998, Computing Supplement.

[21]  S. Suresh.  Fatigue of materials , 1991 .

[22]  Subramaniam Rajan,et al.  A comparison of Natural and Geometric Approaches for Shape Optimal Design , 1990 .