Uncertainty associated with virtual measurements from computational quantum chemistry models

A value for the measurand determined from a computational model is frequently referred to as a virtual measurement to distinguish it from a physical measurement, which is determined from a laboratory experiment. Any measurement, physical or virtual, is incomplete without a quantitative statement of its associated uncertainty. The science and technology of making physical measurements and quantifying their uncertainties has evolved over many decades. In contrast, the science and technology of making virtual measurements is evolving. We propose an approach for quantifying the uncertainty associated with a virtual measurement of a molecular property determined from a computational quantum chemistry model. The proposed approach is based on the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, published by the International Organization for Standardization, and it uses the Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[1]  Mihaly Kallay,et al.  W3 theory: robust computational thermochemistry in the kJ/mol accuracy range. , 2003, Journal of Chemical Physics.

[2]  Vincenzo Barone,et al.  Exchange functionals with improved long-range behavior and adiabatic connection methods without adjustable parameters: The mPW and mPW1PW models , 1998 .

[3]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[4]  Antara Dutta,et al.  Full configuration interaction potential energy curves for breaking bonds to hydrogen: An assessment of single-reference correlation methods , 2003 .

[5]  A. Szabó,et al.  Modern quantum chemistry : introduction to advanced electronic structure theory , 1982 .

[6]  T. Dunning,et al.  A Road Map for the Calculation of Molecular Binding Energies , 2000 .

[7]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms , 1998 .

[8]  Wesley D. Allen,et al.  The heat of formation of NCO , 1993 .

[9]  Jürgen Gauss,et al.  Coupled‐cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open‐shell Hartree–Fock and other general single determinant reference functions. Energies and analytical gradients , 1993 .

[10]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[12]  Raghu N. Kacker,et al.  On use of Bayesian statistics to make the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement consistent , 2003 .

[13]  Jan M. L. Martin Coupling between the convergence behavior of basis set and electron correlation: a quantitative study , 1997 .

[14]  Karl K. Irikura New Empirical Procedures for Improving ab Initio Energetics , 2002 .