International actors and democracy promotion in central and eastern Europe: the integration model and its limits

This article focuses on the key influence of international organizations, and specifically the European Union, in the process of democratization in central and eastern European (CEE) states. It argues that the process of accession to the EU by these post-communist states undergoing regime change, including the pressure to conform to the EU's pre-membership conditions, has led to the emergence of a unique model of democracy promotion through integration. This model appears to be more successful in fostering democracy than the efforts of other international organizations such as the Council of Europe, the OSCE, NATO or regional integration bodies in other parts of the world. To explain the EU's success the article investigates the particular combination of hard conditionality and soft measures such as twinning and of top-down and bottom-up approaches that it has employed to strengthen democratic institutions in CEE. Since membership of the EU is the lynchpin of this approach, it has good chances of success in dealing with viable candidates, but limited potential when encountering defective democracies with little chance of becoming EU members. G. Pridham, Department of Politics, University of Bristol, 10 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. E-mail: g.pridham@bristol.ac.uk

[1]  M. Bullimore.  Sometimes less is more..... , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Geoffrey Pridham.  EU Enlargement and Consolidating Democracy in Post-Communist States - Formality and Reality , 2003 .

[3]  A. Dimitrova.  Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU's Administrative Capacity Requirement , 2002 .

[4]  Jon C. W. Pevehouse.  Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization , 2002, International Organization.

[5]  W. Jacoby.  ORDERING FROM THE MENU: HOW CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN STATES COPE WITH EU DEMANDS FOR INSTITUTIONAL REFORM , 2002 .

[6]  Frank Schimmelfennig,et al.  The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union , 2001, International Organization.

[7]  Reimund Seidelmann.  International Security and Democracy Building , 2001 .

[8]  T. Gallagher.  Building Democracy in Romania: Internal Shortcomings and External Neglect , 2001 .

[9]  Jeffrey T. Checkel.  Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change , 2001, International Organization.

[10]  H. Grabbe.  How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity , 2001 .

[11]  G. Pridham.  Romania and European Union Accession: the domestic dimension , 2001 .

[12]  Philippe C. Schmitter,et al.  Promozione e protezione della democrazia: Il concetto, le ricerche, la valutazione , 2000 .

[13]  Jeffrey T. Checkel.  Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe , 1999 .

[14]  Thomas Carothers.  Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve , 1999 .

[15]  H. Grabbe.  Enlargement and integration in the European Union , 1997 .

[16]  Andrew P. Cortell,et al.  How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms , 1996 .