Effects on efficiency in repetitive lifting of load and frequency combinations at a constant total power output

SumaryBoxes were lifted and lowered repetitively at three different combinations of load and frequency. These combinations were chosen such that the total mechanical power generated was constant. Effects of the varying load or frequency conditions (but constant total mechanical power) on the rate of energy expenditure (M) and on the mechanical efficiency (ME) were measured. Mechanical power was determined from film analysis and separated into external power (generated to lift the load) and internal power (to raise the lifter's body mass). The M was determined from oxygen consumption measurements. The ME was calculated in two ways, depending on the definition of mechanical power, including either the external power only (MEext) or the total power output (MEtot). Despite a constant total mechanical power, M increased at higher loads and lower frequencies. This might be explained by the increasing isometric force required in postural and load control. The M increase resulted in a decrease of MEtot. However, at higher loads and lower frequencies MEext increased, indicating that more external work can be done at the same energy costs at higher loads or lower frequencies, which could be of interest from the point of view of occupational physiology. It would seem that at higher loads or lower frequencies the increased costs for isometric muscle action do not outweigh the benefit of raising the body less frequently. Furthermore, it was found that the ME,, in lifting was much lower than the values reported for other kinds of activity. This was due to the large proportion of total power output that was internal power in repetitive lifting [e.g. 83.1% (at a load of 6 kg) in the present study].

[1]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  A Work Physiology Study of the Relative Effects of Pace and Weight in a Carton Handling Task , 1969 .

[2]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[3]  L Garby,et al.  The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  S P Dutta,et al.  Developing norms for manual carrying tasks using mechanical efficiency as the optimization criterion. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[5]  L. Pugh The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  S Kumar,et al.  The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[7]  K. Jørgensen,et al.  Physiological problems in repetitive lifting with special reference to tolerance limits to the maximum lifting frequency. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[8]  S. J. Legg,et al.  Maximal aerobic capacity for repetitive lifting: comparison with three standard exercise testing modes , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[9]  K. Williams The relationship between mechanical and physiological energy estimates. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  A. R. Lind,et al.  Comparison of metabolic and ventilatory responses of men to various lifting tasks and bicycle ergometry. , 1978, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[11]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  The efficiency of human movement--a statement of the problem. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  G. Andersson Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in Industry , 1981, Spine.

[13]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A computerized biomechanical model-development of and use in studying gross body actions. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  R. Shephard,et al.  Human Physiological Work Capacity , 1978 .

[15]  B. A. Wilson,et al.  Exercise efficiency: validity of base-line subtractions. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[16]  M. de Looze,et al.  Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of Loads on the Lumbar Spine , 1981, Spine.

[18]  Arun Garg,et al.  Stoop or Squat: A Biomechanical and Metabolic Evaluation , 1979 .

[19]  S J Legg,et al.  A physiological study of the repetitive lifting capabilities of healthy young males. , 1984, Ergonomics.