The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency

When listeners hear a speaker become disfluent, they expect the speaker to refer to something new. What is the mechanism underlying this expectation? In a mouse-tracking experiment, listeners sought to identify images that a speaker was describing. Listeners more strongly expected new referents when they heard a speaker say um than when they heard a matched utterance where the um was replaced by noise. This expectation was speaker-specific: it depended on what was new and old for the current speaker, not just on what was new or old for the listener. This finding suggests that listeners treat fillers as collateral signals.

[1]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[2]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[3]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[4]  D. Barr.  Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[5]  D. Barr.  Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners , 2008, Speech Commun..

[7]  D. Donaldson,et al.  It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension , 2007, Cognition.

[8]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  D. Barr,et al.  Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use , 2006 .

[10]  James S Magnuson,et al.  Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .

[13]  S. Brennan.  4 How Conversation Is Shaped by Visual and Spoken Evidence , 2005 .

[14]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction , 2004 .

[15]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Old and Thee, uh, New , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences , 2003 .

[17]  D. Barr.  Paralinguistic correlates of conceptual structure , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Jean E. Fox Tree,et al.  Interpreting Pauses and Ums at Turn Exchanges , 2002 .

[19]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  J. E. Tree.  Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. , 2001 .

[21]  S. Brennan,et al.  How Listeners Compensate for Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech , 2001 .

[22]  D. Barr.  Trouble in mind: paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication , 2001 .

[23]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[24]  Robbert-Jan Beun,et al.  Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[25]  S. Brennan,et al.  THE FEELING OF ANOTHER'S KNOWING : PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS , 1995 .

[26]  M. Swerts,et al.  Prosody as a Marker of Information Flow in Spoken Discourse , 1994 .

[27]  H. H. Clark,et al.  On the Course of Answering Questions , 1993 .

[28]  S. Brennan.  Seeking and providing evidence for mutual understanding , 1990 .

[29]  James G. Martin,et al.  The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech , 1968 .