SPATIAL STATISTICS OF TEXTONS

Texture classification is one of the most studied and challenging problems in computer vision. A key re- quirement of successful texture classification algorithms is their ability to quantify the complex nature and diversity of real world textures. Recent developments in automatic texture classification have demonstrated the effectiveness of modeling texture elements as cluster centers of responses of a filter bank. Such methods rely primarily on similarity measurements of frequency histograms of vector quantized versions of the target texture. A main problem with these approaches is that pure frequency histograms fail to explicitly account for important spatial interaction between learned texture elements. Spatial interaction is key to classification when analyzing textures that have similar texture element frequency but differ in the way the texture elements are distributed across the image. In this paper, we propose the use of co-occurrence statistics to account for the spatial interaction among learned texture elements. This is accomplished by calculating spatial co-occurrence statistics on the maps of the learned texture elements. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on images from the Brodatz album as well as natural textures from a tropical pollen database. We also present a comparison with a state-of-the-art method for texture classication. Finally, our experiments show that the use of spatial statistics help improve the classification rates for certain textures that present sparse and statistically non-stationary texture elements such as pollen grain textures.

[1]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  What are Textons? , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[6]  MalikJitendra,et al.  Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Texture Classification from Single Images , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Texture synthesis and compression using Gaussian-Markov random field models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recognizing surfaces using three-dimensional textons , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision , 1995, Computer Science Workbench.

[11]  M. Chantler,et al.  Capture and Synthesis of 3D Surface Texture , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  M. Bush Deriving Response Matrices from Central American Modern Pollen Rain , 2000, Quaternary Research.

[13]  Kristin J. Dana,et al.  3D Texture Recognition Using Bidirectional Feature Histograms , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Mark B. Bush,et al.  Introducing a new (freeware) tool for palynology , 2007 .

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[16]  Wei-Liem Loh,et al.  Estimating structured correlation matrices in smooth Gaussian random field models , 2000 .

[17]  Jana Reinhard,et al.  Textures A Photographic Album For Artists And Designers , 2016 .