Evaluating the University of North Texas' Digital Collections and Institutional Repository: An Exploratory Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Use

This article discusses an exploratory assessment evaluating the University of North Texas' digital collections and institutional repository.

[1]  Ellen Dubinsky,et al.  A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions , 2014 .

[2]  Martin Paul Eve,et al.  All That Glisters: Investigating Collective Funding Mechanisms for Gold Open Access in Humanities Disciplines , 2014 .

[3]  Mark Edward Phillips,et al.  UNT Digital Library Value Study Data , 2013 .

[4]  Zheng Ye Yang,et al.  University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study , 2015 .

[5]  Claire Creaser,et al.  Open Access to Research Outputs—Institutional Policies and Researchers' Views: Results From Two Complementary Surveys , 2010 .

[6]  Pamela M. Bluh,et al.  Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age , 2009 .

[7]  Robert Fox.  Digital viability , 2012, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[8]  Jihyun Kim,et al.  Motivating and Impeding Factors Affecting Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories , 2007, J. Digit. Inf..

[9]  Denise Troll Covey,et al.  Recruiting Content for the Institutional Repository: The Barriers Exceed the Benefits , 2011, J. Digit. Inf..

[10]  Jean-Gabriel Bankier,et al.  Digital Repositories at a Crossroads: Achieving Sustainable Success through Campus-wide Engagement , 2010 .

[11]  Helen Nneka Eke,et al.  Digitizing resources for University of Nigeria repository: Process and challenges , 2011, Webology.

[12]  Manorama Tripathi,et al.  An Evaluation of Digital Libraries and Institutional Repositories in India , 2011 .

[13]  Brenda Chawner,et al.  Institutional repositories: assessing their value to the academic community , 2010 .

[14]  Ana Barbarić,et al.  The future of open access in Croatia: a survey of academic and research libraries , 2011 .

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  Jihyun Kim,et al.  Motivations of Faculty Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories , 2011 .

[17]  Terry M. Owen.  Evolution of a Digital Repository: One Institution's Experience , 2011 .

[18]  Daniel G. Dorner,et al.  Subject Librarians' Perceptions of Institutional Repositories as an Information Resource , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[19]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Secrets of Success: Identifying Success Factors in Institutional Repositories , 2009 .

[20]  Kathleen R. Murray,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Preserving Digital Assets , 2012 .

[21]  Isidro F. Aguillo.  Ranking Web of Repositories Metrics, results and a plea for a change , 2009 .

[22]  Jihyun Kim,et al.  Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Carol Peters,et al.  Evaluation of digital libraries , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[24]  A. Abrizah,et al.  Librarians' role as change agents for institutional repositories: A case of Malaysian academic libraries , 2010 .

[25]  R. Cullen,et al.  Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. , 2011 .

[26]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Have digital repositories come of age? The views of library directors , 2013, Webology.

[27]  Carol Tenopir.  Building Evidence of the Value and Impact of Library and Information Services: Methods, Metrics and ROI , 2013 .