Spatial Variability Aware Deep Neural Networks (SVANN): A General Approach

Spatial variability is a prominent feature of various geographic phenomena such as climatic zones, USDA plant hardiness zones, and terrestrial habitat types (e.g., forest, grasslands, wetlands, and deserts). However, current deep learning methods follow a spatial-one-size-fits-all (OSFA) approach to train single deep neural network models that do not account for spatial variability. Quantification of spatial variability can be challenging due to the influence of many geophysical factors. In preliminary work, we proposed a spatial variability aware neural network (SVANN-I, formerly called SVANN ) approach where weights are a function of location but the neural network architecture is location independent. In this work, we explore a more flexible SVANN-E approach where neural network architecture varies across geographic locations. In addition, we provide a taxonomy of SVANN types and a physics inspired interpretation model. Experiments with aerial imagery based wetland mapping show that SVANN-I outperforms OSFA and SVANN-E performs the best of all.

[1]  Aaron J. Smith,et al.  A Semi-Automated, Multi-Source Data Fusion Update of a Wetland Inventory for East-Central Minnesota, USA , 2015, Wetlands.

[2]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[3]  B. Erickson,et al.  Machine Learning for Medical Imaging. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Alexey Shvets,et al.  TernausNet: U-Net with VGG11 Encoder Pre-Trained on ImageNet for Image Segmentation , 2018, Computer-Aided Analysis of Gastrointestinal Videos.

[6]  Ronald Kemker,et al.  Algorithms for semantic segmentation of multispectral remote sensing imagery using deep learning , 2017, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[7]  R. Tiner,et al.  Use of high-altitude aerial photography for inventorying forested wetlands in the United States , 1990 .

[8]  S. Nusser,et al.  The National Resources Inventory: a long-term multi-resource monitoring programme , 1997, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[9]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecosystem Function , 2005 .

[10]  Clifford H. Wagner Simpson's Paradox in Real Life , 1982 .

[11]  Sidra Nawaz,et al.  Mapping spatial heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment: a new era for digital pathology , 2015, Laboratory Investigation.

[12]  Fei Wang,et al.  Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..

[13]  Yan Li,et al.  Spatial Ensemble Learning for Heterogeneous Geographic Data with Class Ambiguity , 2019, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[14]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  A locally-constrained YOLO framework for detecting small and densely-distributed building footprints , 2019, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  W. England,et al.  An Exponential Model Used for optimal Threshold selection on ROC Curues , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  Michael S. Lew,et al.  Deep learning for visual understanding: A review , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Spatial variability of soil carbon in forested and cultivated sites: implications for change detection. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[18]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[19]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Revolutionizing Tree Management via Intelligent Spatial Techniques , 2019, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.