Together We Can Make It Work! Toward a Design Framework for Inclusive and Participatory City-Making of Playable Cities

Making it work together can be challenging when various stakeholders are involved. Given the context of neighborhoods and cities specifically, stakeholders values and interests are not always aligned. In these settings, to construct long-term and sustaining participatory city-making projects, to make it work together, is demanding. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a design framework for inclusive and participatory city-making. This framework is inspired by the playable city perspective in that it endorses an open, exploratory, and interactive mindset of city actors. An extensive literature review on approaches taken for playful and participatory interventions in local communities provides the foundations for the framework. The review brings forward four pillars on which the framework is grounded and four activities for exploration of the design space for participatory city-making. A case study from The Hague (NL) is used to demonstrate how the framework can be applied to design and analyze processes in which city stakeholders together make it work. The case study analysis complements the framework with various research methods to support researchers, urban planners, and designers to engage with all city stakeholders to create playful and participatory interventions, which are inclusive and meaningful for the local community. The research contributions of this paper are the proposed framework and informed suggestions on how this framework in practice assists city stakeholders to together make it work.

[1]  Terry L. Cooper,et al.  Citizen-Centered Collaborative Public Management , 2006 .

[2]  Frances Brazier,et al.  Engaging Children to Co-create Outdoor Play Activities for Place-making , 2020, PDC.

[3]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Living Labbing the Rotterdam Way: Co-Creation as an Enabler for Urban Innovation , 2012 .

[4]  Caroline Nevejan,et al.  Witnessed Presence and the YUTPA Framework , 2009, PsychNology J..

[5]  David Monteyne,et al.  Urban Co-Creation: Envisioning New Digital Tools for Activism and Experimentation in the City , 2011 .

[6]  Jotte I. J. C. De Koning,et al.  Design-Enabled Participatory City Making , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).

[7]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs , 2018, Sustainability.

[8]  Michiel de Lange,et al.  Games as Strong Concepts for City-Making , 2017 .

[9]  Juval Portugali,et al.  The Responsive City Design Game , 2012 .

[10]  Eduardo Oliveira,et al.  Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City , 2017 .

[11]  P. Ehn,et al.  Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges , 2012, Design Issues.

[12]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  StreetTalk: participative design of situated public displays for urban neighborhood interaction , 2014, NordiCHI.

[13]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city , 2012, CSCW.

[14]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? , 2006, PDC '06.

[15]  Scott W. Cunningham,et al.  City Rhythm, logbook of an exploration , 2018 .

[16]  Norma Baldwin,et al.  Comprehensive neighbourhood mapping: developing a powerful tool for child protection , 2002 .

[17]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Ten types of emerging city makers , 2017 .

[18]  Tomasz Jaskiewicz,et al.  Join the Park!: Exploring Opportunities to Lower the Participation Divide in Park Communities , 2019, C&T.

[19]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks , 2015, CHI.

[20]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Empowering Citizens with Spatially Distributed Public Visualization Displays , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[21]  Zheng Yao,et al.  (Infra)structures of Volunteering , 2015, CSCW.

[22]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs , 2014 .

[23]  H. Gintis,et al.  Social Capital and Community Governance , 2002 .

[24]  Jörg Müller,et al.  MyPosition: sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization , 2014, CSCW.

[25]  Benjamin Stokes Locally Played , 2020 .

[26]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Exploring Requirements for Joint Information Sharing in Neighbourhoods: Local Playgrounds in The Hague , 2018, ArtsIT/DLI.

[27]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  The Impact of a Narrative Design Strategy for Information Visualization on a Public Display , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Sens-Us: Designing Innovative Civic Technology for the Public Good , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[29]  Mark Rouncefield,et al.  HCI, Civic Engagement & Trust , 2015, CHI.

[30]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research , 2015, CSCW.

[31]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Creating Shared Encounters Through Fixed and Movable Interfaces , 2017 .

[32]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space , 2015, C&T.

[33]  André O. Bueno,et al.  Designing ICT for Thirdplaceness , 2017 .

[34]  Ingrid Mulder Opening up: Towards a Sociable Smart City , 2015 .

[35]  F. Brazier,et al.  Design for the Value of Presence , 2018 .

[36]  Seppo Leminen,et al.  Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks , 2013 .

[37]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[38]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action , 2009, CHI.

[39]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[40]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Living labs as open-innovation networks , 2012 .

[41]  Michiel de Lange,et al.  Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design , 2013, First Monday.

[42]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  Digital Pop-Up: Investigating Bespoke Community Engagement in Public Spaces , 2015, OZCHI.

[43]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young , 2012, Pervasive.

[44]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground , 2017 .

[45]  John Gaventa,et al.  Representation, Community Leadership and Participation: Citizen Involvement in Neighbourhood Renewal and Local Governance Prepared for the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit Office of Deputy Prime Minister , 2004 .

[46]  Karim Ladha,et al.  PosterVote: expanding the action repertoire for local political activism , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[47]  Frances Brazier,et al.  Exploring design guidelines for fostering citizen engagement through information sharing: Local playgrounds in The Hague , 2018, EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games.

[48]  Troy Innocent Play about Place: Placemaking in location-based game design , 2018, MAB.

[49]  C. Nevejan Presence and the design of trust , 2007 .

[50]  Kim Halskov,et al.  How Participatory Design Works: Mechanisms and Effects , 2019, OZCHI.

[51]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Creativity and design to articulate difference in the conflicted city: collective intelligence in Bogota’s grassroots organisations , 2018, AI & SOCIETY.

[52]  Liesbeth Huybrechts,et al.  Experiential evaluation as a way to talk about livability in a neighborhood in transformation , 2020, PDC.

[53]  S. Juujärvi,et al.  Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? , 2013 .

[54]  Martijn de Waal,et al.  Responsive public spaces : exploring the use of interactive technology in the design of public spaces , 2019 .

[55]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design , 2015 .

[56]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking , 2015 .

[57]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Witnessed Presence in Merging Realities in Healthcare Environments , 2010 .

[58]  Laura E. Kozak,et al.  Sticks, Ropes, Land: Confronting Colonial Practices in Public Space Design , 2020, PDC.

[59]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  Local issues, local uses: tools for robotics and sensing in community contexts , 2009, C&C '09.

[60]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Look! A Healthy Neighborhood: Means to Motivate Participants in Using an App for Monitoring Community Health , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[61]  Delaram Ashtari,et al.  Playful civic skills: A transdisciplinary approach to analyse participatory civic games , 2019, Cities.

[62]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance , 2015 .

[64]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Granularity in reciprocity , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[65]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  The Design of Pseudo-Participation , 2020, PDC.

[66]  Nitin Sawhney,et al.  Ecologies of Contestation in Participatory Design , 2020, PDC.