Efficient Numerical Solver for Simulation of Pulsed Eddy-Current Testing Signals

The pulsed eddy-current testing (PECT) method has the promising capabilities for detecting defects and evaluating material properties. It achieves this through its rich variety of frequency components and large driving electric current. Efficient numerical simulation of PECT signals plays an important role in probe optimization and quantitative signal processing. This study primarily focuses on the development of an efficient numerical solver for PECT signals, and its validation via the consideration of the nondestructive testing problems of wall thinning defects in pipes of nuclear power plants. A frequency domain summation method combined with an interpolation strategy was proposed and implemented. It is based on the finite element method with edge elements. The number of total frequencies used in signal summation and the number of selected frequencies for interpolation were thoroughly discussed. In addition, a code using the time domain integration method was also developed for the signal prediction of a transient PECT problem. It was used for comparison with the frequency domain summation method. A comparison of numerical results of the two proposed simulation methods and experimental results indicates that both of these simulation methods can model PECT signals with high precision. However, the frequency domain summation method combined with an interpolation strategy is much more efficient in its use of simulation time.

[1]  László T. Kóczy,et al.  Approximate reasoning by linear rule interpolation and general approximation , 1993, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[2]  Jin Weon Kim,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the effect of local wall thinning on the failure pressure of elbows , 2009 .

[3]  J. R. Brauer,et al.  Alternative dynamic electromechanical models of magnetic actuators containing eddy currents , 2000 .

[4]  W. Lord,et al.  Pulsed RFEC probe response , 1992 .

[5]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Numerical evaluation of ECT impedance signal due to minute cracks , 1997 .

[6]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Benchmark models of eddy current testing for steam generator tube: Experiment and numerical analysis , 1994 .

[7]  J. Pávó Numerical calculation method for pulsed eddy-current testing , 2002 .

[8]  Weiying Cheng,et al.  Simulation of Transient Eddy-Current Measurement for the Characterization of Depth and Conductivity of a Conductive Plate , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of angular defects by pulsed eddy current thermography , 2010 .

[10]  Guang Yang,et al.  Classification of pulsed eddy current GMR data on aircraft structures , 2010 .

[11]  Kenzo Miya,et al.  Rapid prediction of eddy current testing signals using A−φ method and database , 1999 .

[12]  B. Forghani,et al.  An NDT pulse shape study with TEAM problem 27 , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Mihai Rebican,et al.  Integral Formulation and Genetic Algorithms for Defects Geometry Reconstruction Using Pulse Eddy Currents , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  Dibo Hou,et al.  Analytical modeling for transient probe response in pulsed eddy current testing , 2009 .

[15]  T. Theodoulidis,et al.  Developments in Calculating the Transient Eddy-Current Response From a Conductive Plate , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Identification of crack depths from eddy current testing signal , 1998 .

[17]  Micha Sharir,et al.  Piecewise-Linear Interpolation between Polygonal Slices , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  DEFECT CLASSIFICATION USING A NEW FEATURE FOR PULSED EDDY CURRENT SENSORS , 2005 .

[19]  R. Ludwig,et al.  Numerical and analytical modeling of pulsed eddy currents in a conducting half-space , 1990 .

[20]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Numerical evaluation of correlation between crack size and eddy current testing signal by a very fast simulator , 1998 .

[21]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  Fast analytical modelling for pulsed eddy current evaluation , 2008 .

[22]  K. Miya,et al.  Reconstruction of cracks with physical closure from signals of eddy current testing , 2000 .

[23]  John R. Bowler,et al.  Pulsed eddy-current response to a conducting half-space , 1997 .

[24]  Noritaka Yusa,et al.  Some advances in numerical analysis techniques for quantitative electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation , 2009 .

[25]  Chong-Oh Kim,et al.  The Pulsed Eddy Current Differential Probe to Detect a Thickness Variation in an Insulated Stainless Steel , 2010 .

[26]  Kunio Hasegawa,et al.  Failure behavior of carbon steel pipe with local wall thinning near orifice , 2007 .

[27]  John Bowler,et al.  Transient Eddy-Current Driver Pickup Probe Response Due to a Conductive Plate , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[28]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Fast Signal Predictions of Noised Signals in Eddy Current Testing. , 1999 .

[29]  D.G. Park,et al.  Evaluation of Pulsed Eddy Current Response and Detection of the Thickness Variation in the Stainless Steel , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[30]  E. Cardelli,et al.  FEM time domain analysis for the detection of depth and thickness of cylindrical defects in metallic plates , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.