Investigating a conventional and retrofit power plant on-board a Roll-on/Roll-off cargo ship from a sustainability perspective – A life cycle assessment case study

Abstract Following the enforcement of MARPOL Annex VI Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships , retrofitting conventional power plants with emerging technologies is seen as a means to promote sustainability of marine transport and comply with more stringent emissions legislation. However, a knowledge gap exists as the environmental performance of retrofit power plant solutions incorporating emerging technologies has not been examined using an integrated system approach based on Life Cycle Assessment. The purpose of this research was to investigate if integrating selected emerging technologies i.e. photovoltaic systems, lithium-ion batteries, cold ironing and power-take-off/power-take-in systems supplemented by frequency converters and variable frequency drives into an existing power plant would be to the advantage of a chosen ship type i.e. Roll-on/Roll-off cargo ships, from the perspectives of resource consumption and environmental burden. Using the power plant of an existing vessel as a case study, it was found that cast iron, steel, copper and aluminium were the four materials most commonly consumed during manufacturing phase i.e. 2.9 × 10 5  kg, 1.9 × 10 5  kg, 5.3 × 10 4  kg and 2.9 × 10 4  kg respectively. By burning 2.9 × 10 7  kg of heavy fuel oil and 2.3 × 10 8  kg of marine diesel oil during operation, 8.2 × 10 8  kg of carbon dioxide, 1.7 × 10 7  kg of nitrogen oxides, 6.1 × 10 6  kg of sulphur dioxide, 7.6 × 10 5  kg of carbon monoxide, 6.5 × 10 5  kg of hydrocarbon and 4.7 × 10 5  kg of particulate matter would be released. Over a projected 30-year period, emissions released to air and freshwater were found to be significant. Based on 3 characterisation methodologies, ecotoxicity potential, with 7–10 orders of magnitude, was identified as the most significant environmental burden. Consuming and storing resources had the least impact, operating diesel engines and auxiliary generators had a moderate impact, and disposing metallic waste had the highest impact. The research concluded that the environmental burden caused by a marine power plant was significant but retrofitting existing power plant with suitable emerging technologies could reduce a number of impacts by 4–7 orders of magnitude, as verified via scenario analysis. However, the system should be designed and managed with due care as the environmental benefits, such as lower fuel consumption, emission reduction and performance improvement in some environmental measures are always achieved at the expense of an increase in other detrimental impacts.

[1]  John Prousalidis,et al.  PV Systems Installed in Marine Vessels: Technologies and Specifications , 2013 .

[2]  Francisco Pérez-Arribas,et al.  EU-CargoXpress: Wind Propulsion Concept , 2012 .

[3]  Oihane C. Basurko,et al.  Methodology for the sustainability assessment of marine technologies , 2014 .

[4]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  Is new emission legislation stimulating the implementation of sustainable and energy-efficient maritime technologies? , 2015 .

[5]  Hongrui Ma,et al.  Well-to-wake energy and greenhouse gas analysis of SOX abatement options for the marine industry , 2012 .

[6]  Judith Kildow Testing the waters: An analytical framework for testing the political feasibility of scenario-based proposals for disposing of CO2 in the oceans , 1997 .

[7]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation , 2010 .

[8]  Hwa-Joong Kim,et al.  An epsilon-optimal algorithm considering greenhouse gas emissions for the management of a ship’s bunker fuel , 2012 .

[9]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Environmental governance mechanisms in shipping firms and their environmental performance , 2015 .

[10]  Min-Hsiung Yang,et al.  Thermal and economic analyses of a compact waste heat recovering system for the marine diesel engine using transcritical Rankine cycle , 2015 .

[11]  Zigor Uriondo,et al.  Effects of charged air temperature and pressure on NOx emissions of marine medium speed engines , 2011 .

[12]  Davide Lauria,et al.  A sustainable electrical interface to mitigate emissions due to power supply in ports , 2016 .

[13]  Takuji Nakashima,et al.  A study on the performance of cascade hard sails and sail-equipped vessels , 2015 .

[14]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  A review on the use of gas and steam turbine combined cycles as prime movers for large ships. Part I: Background and design , 2008 .

[15]  William J. Hall,et al.  Assessment of CO2 and priority pollutant reduction by installation of shoreside power , 2010 .

[16]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  The fleet renewal problem with regional emission limitations: Case study from Roll-on/Roll-off shipping , 2015 .

[17]  Fabio Ballini,et al.  The development of a decision making framework for evaluating the trade-off solutions of cleaner seaborne transportation , 2015 .

[18]  Hulda Winnes,et al.  Emissions of NOX and particles from manoeuvring ships , 2010 .

[19]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport , 2014 .

[20]  J. Baker New technology and possible advances in energy storage , 2008 .

[21]  Stefano Zuin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of ship-generated waste management of Luka Koper. , 2009, Waste management.

[22]  David Gibbs,et al.  The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions , 2014 .

[23]  Jannick H. Schmidt,et al.  Eco Island Ferry: Comparative LCA of island ferry with carbon fibre composite based and steel based structures , 2014 .

[24]  亀山 道弘,et al.  Study on Life Cycle Impact Assessment for Ships , 2007 .

[25]  Mattias Hallquist,et al.  Characterization of fleet emissions from ships through multi-individual determination of size-resolved particle emissions in a coastal area , 2015 .

[26]  Zigor Uriondo,et al.  Correcting injection pressure maladjustments to reduce NOx emissions by marine diesel engines , 2009 .

[27]  Taher Niknam,et al.  An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming framework for multi-objective optimal micro-grid operation , 2012 .

[28]  J. Ling-Chin,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) – from analysing methodology development to introducing an LCA framework for marine photovoltaic (PV) systems , 2016 .

[29]  Maria Boile,et al.  Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: A comparative analysis of current methods , 2015 .

[30]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil , 2014 .

[31]  M. Romero Gómez,et al.  Analysis and efficiency enhancement of a boil-off gas reliquefaction system with cascade cycle on board LNG carriers , 2015 .

[32]  Francesco Di Natale,et al.  Particulate matter in marine diesel engines exhausts: Emissions and control strategies , 2015 .

[33]  M. Narimani,et al.  A novel approach to multi-objective optimal power flow by a new hybrid optimization algorithm considering generator constraints and multi-fuel type , 2013 .

[34]  Selma Bengtsson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of marine fuels - A comparative study of four fossil fuels for marine propulsion , 2011 .

[35]  M Prinĉaud,et al.  Developing a tool for environmental impact assessment and eco-design for ships , 2010 .

[36]  Taher Niknam,et al.  A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow , 2011 .

[37]  Kjersti Hestad Strand,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Fuel Cells onboard ships , 2010 .

[38]  Ciuffo Biagio,et al.  Regulating Air Emissions from Ships: The State of the Art on Methodologies, Technologies and Policy Options , 2010 .

[39]  David J. Atkinson,et al.  Electrical characteristics of cold ironing energy supply for berthed ships , 2015 .

[40]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions , 2012 .

[41]  Ian G. Brosnan,et al.  The diminishing age gap between polar cruisers and their ships: A new reason to codify the IMO Guidelines for ships operating in polar waters and make them mandatory? , 2011 .

[42]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas , 2015 .

[43]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation , 2013 .

[44]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey , 2013 .

[45]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  Design and modeling of an advanced marine machinery system including waste heat recovery and removal of sulphur oxides , 2013 .

[46]  Vilmar Æsøy,et al.  Emission characteristics of GTL fuel as an alternative to conventional marine gas oil , 2013 .

[47]  Habin Lee,et al.  Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: A review and future directions , 2015 .

[48]  Peilin Zhou,et al.  A comparative study on life cycle analysis of molten carbon fuel cells and diesel engines for marine application , 2006 .

[49]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas , 2015 .

[50]  Fabio Ballini,et al.  Air pollution from ships in ports: The socio-economic benefit of cold-ironing technology , 2015 .

[51]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Modeling energy use and emissions from North American shipping: application of the ship traffic, energy, and environment model. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  Selma Bengtsson,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Two Pathways Towards the Use of Biofuels in Shipping , 2012 .

[53]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion plants for Ferries and RoRo ships , 2014 .

[54]  Halvor Schøyen,et al.  A decision making tool concerning retrofit of shaft generator frequency converter , 2015 .

[55]  Mahesh Swamy,et al.  An improved active front end non-regenerative rectifier system employing a five-limb inductor , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[56]  Alberto Traverso,et al.  Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships , 2010 .

[57]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  A review on the use of gas and steam turbine combined cycles as prime movers for large ships. Part II: Previous work and implications , 2008 .

[58]  George G. Dimopoulos,et al.  A general-purpose process modelling framework for marine energy systems , 2014 .

[59]  Sonja Peterson,et al.  The potential contribution of the shipping sector to an efficient reduction of global carbon dioxide emissions , 2014 .

[60]  D. Golomb Transport systems for ocean disposal of CO2 and their environmental effects , 1997 .

[61]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels , 2014 .

[62]  Juan Moreno-Gutiérrez,et al.  The impact of marine engine operation and maintenance on emissions , 2012 .

[63]  Wieslaw Ostachowicz,et al.  Experimental method of strain/stress measurements on tall sailing ships using Fibre Bragg Grating sensors , 2014 .

[64]  Ahmed Masmoudi,et al.  MATLAB/Simulink Based Modeling of Photovoltaic Cell , 2012 .