Biomechanical comparison of the pull-down strength between TARP system and posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation system on the axis

Objective To compare the pull-down strength on axis between anterior transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) system and posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation (ATSF) system so as to provide a biomechanical basis for clinical application. Methods Six fresh human cadaveric atlantoaxial specimens (C0-C3) with intact ligaments were instrumented with TARP system and ATSF system respectively to simulate the reduction procedure of operation, the same stretch strength were loaded on anterior and posterior parts of the atlas and axis (60, 80 and 100N). The pull-down strength on the axis and the degree of displacement of atlantoaxial detachment were measured respectively and then analyzed statistically. Results When loaded with the stretch strength of 60, 80 and 100N, the pull-down strength on the axis generated by TARP system were 26.11±2.08, 36.08±2.40 and 45.01±2.26N, and those generated by ATSF system were 22.09±1.45, 29.77±2.36 and 40.80±3.41N, respectively; the atlantoaxial detaching displacement generated by TARP system was 0.87±0.07, 1.07±0.07 and 1.14±0.06mm respectively, and those generated by ATSF system were 0.82±0.07, 1.01±0.08 and 1.06±0.08mm respectively. The pull-down strength on both the axis and atlantoaxial detaching displacement showed a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The pull-down strength on the axis and atlantoaxial detaching displacement generated by TARP system was significantly superior to those generated by ATSF system, suggesting that the TARP system could be a better fixation system for basilar invagination combined with atlantoaxial dislocation. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2014.07.04

[1]  Qing-shui Yin,et al.  Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate Internal Fixation with Transoral Transpedicular or Articular Mass Screw of C2 for the Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Two Case Reports , 2011, Spine.

[2]  J. Štulík,et al.  Atlantoaxial fixation using the polyaxial screw–rod system , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[3]  D. Belen,et al.  Halo traction in basilar invagination: technical case report. , 2006, Surgical neurology.

[4]  G. Dang,et al.  Open Reduction of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation by Transoral Anterior Atlantoaxial Release and Posterior Internal Fixation , 2006, Spine.

[5]  Qing-shui Yin,et al.  Irreducible Anterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation: One-Stage Treatment With a Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate Fixation and Fusion. Report of 5 Cases and Review of the Literature , 2005, Spine.

[6]  A. Goel Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  P. Statham,et al.  The Halifax Interlaminar Clamp for posterior cervical fusion: initial experience in the United Kingdom. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[9]  A. Brooks,et al.  Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Liao Wenshen Biomechanical analysis of anterior transoral fixation and fusion device for atlantoaxial lateral mass joints , 2013 .

[11]  Z. Kai The applied anatomy of transoral pedicle screws of axis , 2009 .

[12]  Chen Liyan Treatment of occipitalized atlas complicated with basilar invagination by traction and posterior occipitocervical reduction and fusion , 2008 .

[13]  X. Hong Design and biomechanical evaluation of transoralpharyngeal atlantoaxial reduction plate , 2004 .

[14]  F. Magerl,et al.  Stable Posterior Fusion of the Atlas and Axis by Transarticular Screw Fixation , 1987 .

[15]  J. Ramadier,et al.  [Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine]. , 1959, Annales de chirurgie.