PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the glucose analogue fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used to monitor tumour response in patients undergoing chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Numerous studies have shown that FDG-PET is an accurate test to differentiate between residual viable tumour tissue and therapy-induced fibrosis. Furthermore, quantitative assessment of therapy-induced changes in tumour FDG uptake may allow prediction of tumour response and patient outcome very early in the course of therapy. Treatment may be adjusted according to the chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity of the tumour tissue in an individual patient. Thus, FDG-PET has enormous potential to reduce the side effects and costs of ineffective therapy. This review gives an overview of clinical studies on treatment monitoring with FDG-PET and discusses how the results of PET imaging may be used to change patient management.

[1]  W. Winkelmann,et al.  Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Elisabeth Kjellén,et al.  FDG PET studies during treatment: Prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2002, Head & neck.

[3]  M. Christian,et al.  Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.

[5]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of pretransplantation positron emission tomography using fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. , 2003, Blood.

[6]  R. Cerfolio,et al.  Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  R. Buchert,et al.  18FDG-PET following treatment as valid predictor for disease-free survival in Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Wahl,et al.  Effect of hyperglycemia on in vitro tumor uptake of tritiated FDG, thymidine, L-methionine and L-leucine. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. , 1999, Blood.

[12]  A. Alavi,et al.  18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  A. Fischman,et al.  FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[14]  Imran Zoberi,et al.  Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  David Binns,et al.  Early FDG-PET imaging after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: inflammatory changes in normal tissues correlate with tumor response and do not confound therapeutic response evaluation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  U. Cremerius,et al.  Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma , 2001, Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  J. Ajani,et al.  2‐Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[21]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  E. Vellenga,et al.  Predictive value of early 18F‐fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in chemosensitive relapsed lymphoma , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[23]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Thomas,et al.  Grading of tumor regression in non-small cell lung cancer : morphology and prognosis. , 2001, Chest.

[25]  M. Iannettoni,et al.  Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  David Harrington,et al.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  J. Petiot,et al.  Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations , 1994, Cancer.

[28]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  R. Munden,et al.  Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Correlation Between Postoperative 3-[123I]Iodo-l-α-Methyltyrosine Uptake and Survival in Patients with Gliomas , 2001 .

[31]  S. Curley,et al.  Enhanced staging and all chemotherapy preoperatively in patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  Lilli Geworski,et al.  Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  S. Larson,et al.  An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[37]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  J. Vose,et al.  Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[40]  H. Höfler,et al.  Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2003, Cancer.

[41]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  J. Leonard,et al.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  T. Hickish,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  R L Wahl,et al.  Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. , 1995, Radiology.

[45]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  S. Ito,et al.  Decreased 18F-FDG uptake 1 day after initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphomas. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  S. Larson,et al.  Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  J. Bergh,et al.  Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation? , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  N. Altorki,et al.  Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[51]  G. Delling,et al.  Morphological grades of regression in osteosarcoma after polychemotherapy — Study COSS 80 , 2004, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[52]  D. Kelsen Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Individualized neoadjuvant treatment strategy in adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction (AEG): Interim report on the MUNICON trial. , 2004, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  J. Eary,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F‐18]‐fluorodeoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography , 2002, Cancer.

[56]  J. Hanley,et al.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer , 1976, Cancer.

[57]  T. Reichert,et al.  Radiation response non-invasively imaged by [18F]FDG-PET predicts local tumor control and survival in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2003, Oral oncology.

[58]  S. Reske,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response of osteogenic sarcoma using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[59]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  J. Thie Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  V. Diehl,et al.  Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. , 2001, Blood.

[62]  M. Bains,et al.  Preoperative therapy for esophageal cancer: a randomized comparison of chemotherapy versus radiation therapy. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[63]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  J. Eary,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography in localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Cancer.

[65]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.