PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Winkelmann,et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] Elisabeth Kjellén,et al. FDG PET studies during treatment: Prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2002, Head & neck.
[3] M. Christian,et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[4] A. Miller,et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.
[5] P. Dupont,et al. Prognostic value of pretransplantation positron emission tomography using fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. , 2003, Blood.
[6] R. Cerfolio,et al. Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[7] R. Buchert,et al. 18FDG-PET following treatment as valid predictor for disease-free survival in Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[8] J. Nährig,et al. Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[9] R. Wahl,et al. Effect of hyperglycemia on in vitro tumor uptake of tritiated FDG, thymidine, L-methionine and L-leucine. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] Danny Rischin,et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[11] G. Jerusalem,et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. , 1999, Blood.
[12] A. Alavi,et al. 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] A. Fischman,et al. FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology. , 2002, Lung cancer.
[14] Imran Zoberi,et al. Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] David Binns,et al. Early FDG-PET imaging after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: inflammatory changes in normal tissues correlate with tumor response and do not confound therapeutic response evaluation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[16] M. Schwaiger,et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[17] H. Schäfers,et al. Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[18] U. Cremerius,et al. Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma , 2001, Nuklearmedizin.
[19] G. Giaccone,et al. Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.
[20] J. Ajani,et al. 2‐Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.
[21] M. Schwaiger,et al. Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[22] E. Vellenga,et al. Predictive value of early 18F‐fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in chemosensitive relapsed lymphoma , 2003, British journal of haematology.
[23] R L Wahl,et al. Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] M. Thomas,et al. Grading of tumor regression in non-small cell lung cancer : morphology and prognosis. , 2001, Chest.
[25] M. Iannettoni,et al. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[26] David Harrington,et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[27] J. Petiot,et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations , 1994, Cancer.
[28] P F Sharp,et al. Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[29] R. Munden,et al. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[30] M. Schwaiger,et al. Correlation Between Postoperative 3-[123I]Iodo-l-α-Methyltyrosine Uptake and Survival in Patients with Gliomas , 2001 .
[31] S. Curley,et al. Enhanced staging and all chemotherapy preoperatively in patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[32] P. Dupont,et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[33] L. Mortelmans,et al. Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[34] Lilli Geworski,et al. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[35] M. Schwaiger,et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[36] S. Larson,et al. An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[37] J. Keyes. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[38] J. Vose,et al. Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[39] Emmanuel Itti,et al. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.
[40] H. Höfler,et al. Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2003, Cancer.
[41] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[42] J. Leonard,et al. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[43] T. Hickish,et al. Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[44] R L Wahl,et al. Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. , 1995, Radiology.
[45] R. Boellaard,et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[46] S. Ito,et al. Decreased 18F-FDG uptake 1 day after initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphomas. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[47] S. Larson,et al. Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[48] M. van Glabbeke,et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[49] J. Bergh,et al. Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation? , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[50] N. Altorki,et al. Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[51] G. Delling,et al. Morphological grades of regression in osteosarcoma after polychemotherapy — Study COSS 80 , 2004, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.
[52] D. Kelsen. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[53] M. Schwaiger,et al. Individualized neoadjuvant treatment strategy in adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction (AEG): Interim report on the MUNICON trial. , 2004, Journal of Clinical Oncology.
[54] M. Schwaiger,et al. Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[55] J. Eary,et al. Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F‐18]‐fluorodeoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography , 2002, Cancer.
[56] J. Hanley,et al. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer , 1976, Cancer.
[57] T. Reichert,et al. Radiation response non-invasively imaged by [18F]FDG-PET predicts local tumor control and survival in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2003, Oral oncology.
[58] S. Reske,et al. Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response of osteogenic sarcoma using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[59] Robert B Livingston,et al. Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[60] J. Thie. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[61] V. Diehl,et al. Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. , 2001, Blood.
[62] M. Bains,et al. Preoperative therapy for esophageal cancer: a randomized comparison of chemotherapy versus radiation therapy. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[63] M Schwaiger,et al. Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[64] J. Eary,et al. Use of positron emission tomography in localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Cancer.
[65] M. O'Doherty,et al. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.