Lack of integration between engineering industrial design processes: an analysis based on the historical evolution of professions and tools

Numerous researches provide evidence that Industrial design is key to trigger, foster and sustain innovation and can lead to a measurable performance growth of the business. Nevertheless, their integration with the engineering design process has been difficult since the birth of the profession. The lack of dedicated design tools responding to their specific needs is one of the most important reasons for this stagnation. In this paper we propose an historical and technical approach to trace the evolution of digital design tools. It appears they can be classified inside two archetypal categories. The first one has been designed to address the needs of the engineers such as the reusability of design for manufacturing purposes. The second one was made for graphical artist, for artistic composition or with the capacity to animate and render three-dimensional models. The industrial designer profession use tools with qualities from both categories – neither of which have been designed for her specific needs. We detail the technical reasons for this evolution and we argue it might be possible to solve this issue with a holistic consideration of both approaches.

[1]  Lucia Rampino,et al.  The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-design Field , 2011 .

[2]  Brett Robertson,et al.  Creativity and the Use of CAD Tools: Lessons for Engineering Design Education From Industry , 2007 .

[3]  Raymond Loewy,et al.  La laideur se vend mal , 1990 .

[4]  Elisabeth Nesheim Framing Embodiment in General-Purpose Computing. A study identifying key components in a multimodel general-purpose computational environment , 2011 .

[5]  Tomás Dorta,et al.  The ideation gap:: hybrid tools, design flow and practice , 2008 .

[6]  A rocky road to globalization: late 20th century American machine tool building , 2010 .

[7]  Karl Sabbagh,et al.  21st century jet : the making and marketing of the Boeing 777 , 1996 .

[8]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  Sketchpad a Man-Machine Graphical Communication System , 1899, Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences.

[9]  Benoit Weil,et al.  La conception innovante comme mode d'extension et de régénération de la conception réglée : les expériences oubliées aux origines des Bureaux d'études , 2010 .

[10]  Edwin Earl Catmull,et al.  A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces. , 1974 .

[11]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[12]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Breaking the dilemma between robustness and generativeness , 2013 .

[13]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[14]  Bettina Von Stamm,et al.  Managing Innovation, Design and Creativity , 2003 .

[15]  A. M. Snodgrass,et al.  Objects of desire , 1998, Nature.

[16]  D. C. Engelbart,et al.  Computer-aided display control Final report , 1965 .

[17]  P. Bézier Numerical control : mathematics and applications , 1972 .