Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops®

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer variability of the computerized radiologic measurements using Keops® and to determine the bias between the software and the standard paper measurement.MethodsFour individuals measured all frontal and sagittal variables on the 30 X-rays randomly selected on two occasions (test and retest conditions). The Bland–Altman plot was used to determine the degree of agreement between the measurement on paper X-ray and the measurement using Keops® for all reviewers and for the two measures; the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each pair of analyses to assess interobserver reproducibility among the four reviewers for the same patient using either paper X-ray or Keops® measurement and finally, concordance correlation coefficient (rc) was calculated to assess intraobserver repeatability among the same reviewer for one patient between the two measure using the same method (paper or Keops®).ResultsThe mean difference calculated between the two methods was minimal at −0, 4° ± 3.41° [−7.1; 6.4] for frontal measurement and 0.1° ± 3.52° [−6.7; 6.8] for sagittal measurement. Keops® has a better interobserver reproducibility than paper measurement for determination of the sagittal pelvic parameter (ICC = 0.9960 vs. 0.9931; p = 0.0001). It has a better intraobserver repeatability than paper for determination of Cobbs angle (rc = 0.9872 vs. 0.9808; p < 0.0001) and for pelvic parameter (rc = 0.9981 vs. 0.9953; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsWe conclude that Keops® has no bias compared to the traditionally paper measurement, and moreover, the repeatability and the reproducibility of measurements with this method is much better than with similar standard radiologic measures done manually in both frontal and sagittal plane and that the use of this software can be recommended for clinical application.Level of evidenceDiagnostic, level III.

[1]  H Labelle,et al.  A Variability Study of Computerized Sagittal Spinopelvic Radiologic Measurements of Trunk Balance , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  Nathan Peled,et al.  Sacral Orientation Revisited , 2007, Spine.

[3]  M. Tunyogi-Csapó,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  Nathan Peled,et al.  Orientation of the human sacrum: anthropological perspectives and methodological approaches. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  S. Aunoble,et al.  Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[6]  C. Edwards,et al.  Radiographic Markers in Spondyloptosis: Implications for Spondylolisthesis Progression , 2002, Spine.

[7]  S. Hansen,et al.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain , 2000, European spine journal.

[8]  C. Schmidt,et al.  A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Breen,et al.  Reliability and measurement error of 3-dimensional regional lumbar motion measures: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[10]  Xinling Shi,et al.  A Computer-aided Cobb Angle Measurement Method and its Reliability , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  Alan P Pinheiro,et al.  Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  B. Ilharreborde,et al.  Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[13]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Automatic Cobb Angle Determination From Radiographic Images , 2013, Spine.

[14]  Michiel M. A. Janssen,et al.  Evaluation of pelvic morphology in the sagittal plane. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Automatic Cobb Angle Determination From , 2013 .

[17]  R. Jackson,et al.  Congruent Spinopelvic Alignment on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers , 2000, Spine.

[18]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Sagittal spino-pelvic balance is a crucial analysis for normal and degenerative spine , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[19]  D. Cook,et al.  Reliability of computer-assisted lumbar intervertebral measurements using a novel vertebral motion analysis system. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  Chun Kee Chung,et al.  Validation of a simple computerized tool for measuring spinal and pelvic parameters. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  Boštjan Likar,et al.  A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[22]  D. Czaprowski,et al.  Intra- and interobserver repeatability of the assessment of anteroposterior curvatures of the spine using Saunders digital inclinometer. , 2012, Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja.

[23]  A Comparison of Film and Computer Workstation Measurements of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability , 2010, Spine.

[24]  J. Pruijs,et al.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis , 1994, Skeletal Radiology.

[25]  R. Jackson,et al.  Pelvic Lordosis and Alignment in Spondylolisthesis , 2003, Spine.

[26]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Test-retest Repeatability of Lumbar Sagittal Alignment and Disc Height Measurements With or Without Axial Loading: A Computed Tomography Study , 2011, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[27]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[28]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[29]  Katherine A. Kosman,et al.  Precision of Lumbar Intervertebral Measurements: Does a Computer-Assisted Technique Improve Reliability? , 2011, Spine.

[30]  Samuel Kadoury,et al.  Reliability and Accuracy Analysis of a New Semiautomatic Radiographic Measurement Software in Adult Scoliosis , 2011, Spine.

[31]  E. Berthonnaud,et al.  Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Francesco Palmieri,et al.  Reproducibility of a semi-automatic method for 6-point vertebral morphometry in a multi-centre trial. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[33]  Leonid Kalichman,et al.  Lumbar lordosis. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[34]  D. Polly,et al.  Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Technique Variability , 1996, Spine.

[35]  J. Yang,et al.  Reliability of Lumbar Lordosis Measurement in Patients With Spondylolisthesis: A Case-Control Study Comparing the Cobb, Centroid, and Posterior Tangent Methods , 2010, Spine.

[36]  J. Pélissier,et al.  Anatomical reliability of two fundamental radiological and clinical pelvic parameters: incidence and thickness , 2005, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[37]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[38]  J. Cobb.  The problem of the primary curve. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  R. Jackson,et al.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. , 2000, Spine.

[40]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  A Variability Study of Computerized Sagittal Sacral Radiologic Measures , 2010, Spine.

[41]  C. Candotti,et al.  Validation, repeatability and reproducibility of a noninvasive instrument for measuring thoracic and lumbar curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane. , 2011, Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)).