Massive Project Based Learning through a Competition: Impact of and Insights from the e-Yantra Robotics Competition (eYRC -- 2013)

Embedded systems and robotics are interdisciplinary and have a wide range of applications, making them ideal subjects for sparking innovation and creative thinking in engineering students. One way to teach these subjects to students across the country is through distance education. However, as hands-on experiments are a major part of such courses to be effective, and since most colleges lack robotics labs, such attempts have proven to be ineffective. By combining aspects from on-line distance education, multimedia content dissemination, and a step-by-step approach to impart Project Based Learning, e-Yantra Robotics Competition (eYRC) addresses this challenge. One hundred and sixty teams of four members each were provided with: (i) a real-world problem abstracted as a theme, (ii) a robotic kit along with accessories to implement a solution to a given theme, and (iii) tasks with associated templates to train them on the various steps of a project life cycle over the 4-month duration of the competition. Results show that 94% of the teams gained basic knowledge of embedded systems and robotics, with 60% successfully implementing a solution on the robot and 24% exhibiting creativity and critical thinking skills in addition.

[1]  Slobodan Kalajdziski,et al.  Project Based Learning of Embedded Systems , 2008, ArXiv.

[2]  David Duanne Rowlands,et al.  Project Based Learning in Embedded Systems: a Case Study , 2012 .

[3]  Carlos Almeida.  Practical experience teaching embedded systems , 2008, SIGBED.

[4]  Cher C. Hendricks,et al.  The Impact of Participation in VEX Robotics Competition on Middle and High School Students’ Interest in Pursuing STEM Studies and STEM-related Careers , 2012 .

[5]  Julie E. Mills,et al.  Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer , 2003 .

[6]  Saraswathi Krithivasan,et al.  Learning by competing and competing by learning: Experience from the e-Yantra Robotics Competition , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[7]  Denny C. Davis,et al.  Categories And Levels For Defining Engineering Design Program Outcomes , 1997 .

[8]  Chan Jin Chung,et al.  KOBOTICS CONTESTS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2003 .

[9]  Robin R. Murphy.  "Competing" for a robotics education , 2001, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[10]  L. Anneberg,et al.  Robotics contests and comtuter science and engineering education , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[11]  Sridhar Iyer,et al.  Experiences with an interactive satellite based distance education program , 2004 .

[12]  Sven Seiler,et al.  Embedded System and Robotic Education in a Blended Learning Environment Utilizing Remote and Virtual Labs in the Cloud, Accompanied by 'Robotic HomeLab Kit' , 2012, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[13]  J. Prabakaran,et al.  Massive Open Online Course , 2014 .

[14]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. , 2013 .

[15]  Johannes Strobel,et al.  When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms , 2009 .

[16]  Saraswathi Krithivasan,et al.  e-Yantra lab setup initiative: Sustainable knowledge creation and scalable infrastructure creation at engineering colleges , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[17]  E. Trudell.  DEVELOPMENT OF METHODOLOGIES TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS COMPETITIONS IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATH EDUCATION , 2009 .

[18]  Aaron S. Blicblau,et al.  Undergraduate Engineering Project Work , 2010 .