Portfolio optimization under Solvency II

In the current low interest-rate and highly-regulated environment investing capital efficiently is one of the most important challenges insurance companies face. Certain quantitative parts of regulatory requirements (e.g. Solvency II capital requirements) result in constraints on the investment strategies. This paper mathematically describes the implications of Solvency II constraints on the investment strategies of insurance companies in an expected utility framework with a focus on the market risk module. For this constrained expected utility problem, we define a two-step approach that leads to closed-form approximations for the optimal investment strategies. This proposal circumvents the technical difficulties encountered when applying the convex duality approach or the theory of viscosity solutions. The investment strategies found using the two-step approach can be understood as the optimal investment strategies for constraint problems according to Solvency II. The impact of such constraints on the asset allocation and the performance of these strategies is assessed in a numerical case study.

[1]  Nadine Gatzert,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Basel II/III and Solvency II , 2012 .

[2]  Daniel Bauer,et al.  Solvency II and Nested Simulations - a Least-Squares Monte Carlo Approach , 2009 .

[3]  Roy Kouwenberg Strategic Asset Allocation and Risk Budgeting for Insurers Under Solvency II , 2017 .

[4]  Hato Schmeiser,et al.  Portfolio Optimization Under Solvency II: Implicit Constraints Imposed by the Market Risk Standard Formula , 2013 .

[5]  Dirk Höring,et al.  Will Solvency II Market Risk Requirements Bite? The Impact of Solvency II on Insurers’ Asset Allocation , 2013 .

[6]  Hua He,et al.  Convergence from Discrete to Continuous Time Contingent Claims Prices , 1990 .

[7]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[8]  Risk measures versus ruin theory for the calculation of solvency capital for long-term life insurances , 2016 .

[9]  Jakša Cvitanić,et al.  Convex Duality in Constrained Portfolio Optimization , 1992 .

[10]  D. Pfeifer,et al.  Solvency II: stability problems with the SCR aggregation formula , 2008 .

[11]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[12]  Optimal Investment Strategies for Insurance Companies when Capital Requirements are Imposed by a Standard Formula , 2015 .

[13]  T. Björk Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time , 2019 .

[14]  J. Cox,et al.  Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process , 1989 .

[15]  Rudi Zagst,et al.  Monotonicity and bounds for convex stochastic control models , 1994, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[16]  Casey G. Rothschild Nonexclusivity, Linear Pricing, and Annuity Market Screening , 2015 .

[17]  T. Zariphopoulou Consumption-Investment Models with Constraints , 1994 .

[18]  Stanley R. Pliska,et al.  A Stochastic Calculus Model of Continuous Trading: Optimal Portfolios , 1986, Math. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Sandström Solvency II: Calibration for skewness , 2007 .

[20]  S. Shreve,et al.  Optimal portfolio and consumption decisions for a “small investor” on a finite horizon , 1987 .

[21]  Joan T. Schmit,et al.  The Solvency Ii Process: Overview and Critical Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  R. Doff A Critical Analysis of the Solvency II Proposals , 2008 .

[23]  Rudi Zagst Interest-Rate Management , 2002 .

[24]  M. Christiansen,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL DEFINITION OF THE SOLVENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENT IN SOLVENCY II , 2014, ASTIN Bulletin.

[25]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case , 1969 .

[26]  S. Mittnik Solvency II Calibrations: Where Curiosity Meets Spuriosity , 2016 .