Bystander Responses to a Violent Incident in an Immersive Virtual Environment

Under what conditions will a bystander intervene to try to stop a violent attack by one person on another? It is generally believed that the greater the size of the crowd of bystanders, the less the chance that any of them will intervene. A complementary model is that social identity is critical as an explanatory variable. For example, when the bystander shares common social identity with the victim the probability of intervention is enhanced, other things being equal. However, it is generally not possible to study such hypotheses experimentally for practical and ethical reasons. Here we show that an experiment that depicts a violent incident at life-size in immersive virtual reality lends support to the social identity explanation. 40 male supporters of Arsenal Football Club in England were recruited for a two-factor between-groups experiment: the victim was either an Arsenal supporter or not (in-group/out-group), and looked towards the participant for help or not during the confrontation. The response variables were the numbers of verbal and physical interventions by the participant during the violent argument. The number of physical interventions had a significantly greater mean in the in-group condition compared to the out-group. The more that participants perceived that the Victim was looking to them for help the greater the number of interventions in the in-group but not in the out-group. These results are supported by standard statistical analysis of variance, with more detailed findings obtained by a symbolic regression procedure based on genetic programming. Verbal interventions made during their experience, and analysis of post-experiment interview data suggest that in-group members were more prone to confrontational intervention compared to the out-group who were more prone to make statements to try to diffuse the situation.

[1]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show , 2012, PLoS biology.

[2]  S. Reicher,et al.  Working Toward the Experimenter , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  J. Burger.  Obedience to Authority , 2011 .

[4]  M. Heene,et al.  The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Mel Slater,et al.  Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment , 2010, TAP.

[6]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  Male physical risk taking in a virtual environment , 2010 .

[7]  Marco Gillies,et al.  Comparing and Evaluating Real Time Character Engines for Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  D. Vercelli,et al.  A Flexible Framework for Wide-Spectrum VR Development , 2010 .

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  M. Slater,et al.  The Use of Virtual Reality in the Study of People's Responses to Violent Incidents , 2009, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[12]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[13]  Jay J Van Bavel,et al.  Self-Categorization With a Novel Mixed-Race Group Moderates Automatic Social and Racial Biases , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  Mark Levine,et al.  The responsive bystander: how social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Cade McCall,et al.  What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments? , 2008 .

[16]  V. Banyard.  Measurement and Correlates of Prosocial Bystander Behavior: The Case of Interpersonal Violence , 2008, Violence and Victims.

[17]  X. Bosch.  The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil , 2007 .

[18]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[19]  Peter Fischer,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Are Bystanders More Responsive in Dangerous Emergencies? , 2006 .

[20]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Personal Space in Virtual Reality , 2003, TAP.

[21]  Mark Levine,et al.  Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Mark Levine,et al.  Identity, Place, and Bystander Intervention: Social Categories and Helping After Natural Disasters , 2004, The Journal of social psychology.

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[25]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[26]  Mark Levine,et al.  Self‐Categorization and Bystander Non‐intervention: Two Experimental Studies , 2002 .

[27]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[28]  L Cosmides,et al.  Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Frances Cherry,et al.  The Stubborn Particulars of Social Psychology: Essays on the Research Process , 1994 .

[30]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[31]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[32]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  HyperRESEARCH: A computer program for the analysis of qualitative data with an emphasis on hypothesis testing and multimedia analysis , 1991 .

[33]  H. Harari,et al.  The reaction to rape by American male bystanders. , 1985, The Journal of social psychology.

[34]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[35]  S H Schwartz,et al.  Bystander anonymity and reactions to emergencies. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Lance Shotland,et al.  Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. , 1976 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Bystander reactions to a violent theft: crime in Jerusalem. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[39]  G. L. Borofsky,et al.  Sex differences in bystander reactions to physical assault , 1971 .

[40]  Bibb Latané,et al.  A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention ☆ , 1969 .

[41]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .