Low and variable atmospheric coupling in irrigated Almond (Prunus dulcis) canopies indicates a limited influence of stomata on orchard evapotranspiration

Abstract The degree of coupling to the environment of almond (Prunus dulcis) orchards during periods of transient water stress was investigated in a two-year study in California. Plant water status was monitored weekly, before and/or after irrigation, measuring midday stem water potential (Ψstem) that ranged from −0.5 to −2 MPa, while actual evapotranspiration (ETa) was measured with an eddy covariance tower. Irrigation was applied weekly following common commercial practice, resulting in weekly cycles of Ψstem. Despite Ψstem reaching levels shown to induce substantial stomatal closure, the ratio actual to reference evapotranspiration (ETa/ETo = Ka) did not show a decrease during weekly periods of low Ψstem in the two years of the study. Midday average canopy surface resistance (rcmid), computed by reversing the Penman-Monteith equation from eddy covariance ET data, yielded a statistically significant increase with a decrease in Ψstem, but just in the first year of the study. However, rcmid did not show a significant relationship with stomatal resistance measured at the leaf level with porometry and scaled-up to the canopy level. In the first year, rcmid showed a sharp increase after harvest, when Ka also decreased, perhaps produced by the composite effect of defoliation associated with harvest and stomatal closure associated with water stress. During the growing season, rcmid ranged from 0 to 100 s m−1 and midday average aerodynamic resistance (ramid) ranged between 0 and 50 s m−1. Despite rcmid being generally larger than ra, the midday average decoupling factor (Ω) averaged 0.7 during the irrigation season, indicating decoupled conditions. However, there was a large day to day fluctuation of midday Ω ranging from 0.16 to 0.98 mostly associated with rcmid and wind speed. This study indicated that tall and rough canopies can be relatively decoupled depending on the effect of wind speed and canopy resistance on the decoupling factor. From a water management point of view, this result suggests that inducing transient mild to moderate water stress may not produce substantial water savings in areas having low to moderate winds.

[1]  Richard L. Snyder,et al.  Water stress causes stomatal closure but does not reduce canopy evapotranspiration in almond , 2016 .

[2]  M. Raupach,et al.  Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types , 1995 .

[3]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Discerning the forest from the trees: an essay on scaling canopy stomatal conductance , 1991 .

[4]  Kenneth A. Shackel,et al.  A Plant-based Approach to Deficit Irrigation in Trees and Vines , 2011 .

[5]  D. W. Grimes,et al.  Water use of mature Thompson Seedless grapevines in California , 2003, Irrigation Science.

[6]  P. Jarvis,et al.  COUPLING OF TRANSPIRATION TO THE ATMOSPHERE IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS: THE OMEGA FACTOR , 1985 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Shackel,et al.  Stem-water Potential as a Sensitive Indicator of Water Stress in Prune Trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French) , 1992 .

[8]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[9]  Arden L. Buck,et al.  New Equations for Computing Vapor Pressure and Enhancement Factor , 1981 .

[10]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[11]  U. KyawThaPaw,et al.  Applications of solutions to non-linear energy budget equations , 1988 .

[12]  L. Schwankl,et al.  Rapid Equilibration of Leaf and Stem Water Potential under Field Conditions in Almonds, Walnuts, and Prunes , 2001 .

[13]  U. KyawThaPaw Mathematical analysis of the operative temperature and energy budget , 1987 .

[14]  P. Jarvis,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – PREDICTING EFFECTS OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON TRANSPIRATION AND EVAPORATION , 1983 .

[15]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Responses of Young Almond Trees to Two Drought Periods in the Field , 1982 .

[16]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region , 1986 .

[17]  C. E. Murphy,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Simplified Models for Simulating Canopy Photosynthesis and Transpiration , 1976 .

[18]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[19]  L. Williams,et al.  Midday measurements of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance are highly correlated with daily water use of Thompson Seedless grapevines , 2012, Irrigation Science.

[20]  Thomas J. Trout,et al.  Weighing lysimeters aid study of water relations in tree and vine crops , 2005 .

[21]  T. Hsiao,et al.  Maize canopies under two soil water regimes: III. Variation in coupling with the atmosphere and the role of leaf area index , 1998 .

[22]  G. Bange,et al.  ON THE QUANTITATIVE EXPLANATION OF STOMATAL TRANSPIRATION , 1953 .

[23]  J. Grace,et al.  The Effect of Wind and Humidity on Leaf Diffusive Resistance in Sitka Spruce Seedlings , 1975 .

[24]  J. Annandale,et al.  Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather: a sensitivity analysis , 1994, Irrigation Science.

[25]  J. F. Kjelgaard,et al.  EVALUATI NG SURFACE RESISTANCE FOR ESTIMATING CORN AND POTATO EVAPOTRANSPIRATION WITH THE PENMAN–MONTEITH MODEL , 2001 .

[26]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Transpiration and canopy conductance in a pristine broad-leaved forest of Nothofagus: an analysis of xylem sap flow and eddy correlation measurements , 1992, Oecologia.

[27]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Prediction of leaf area index in almonds by vegetation indexes , 2012 .

[28]  E. Schulze,et al.  Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration : scaling from leaves to canopies , 1995 .

[29]  Hermann Heilmeier,et al.  Daily and seasonal courses of leaf conductance and abscisic acid in the xylem sap of almond trees [Prunus dulcis (Miller) D. A. Webb] under desert conditions , 1990 .

[30]  Nader Katerji,et al.  A Measurement Based Sensitivity Analysis of the Penman-Monteith Actual Evapotranspiration Model for Crops of Different Height and in Contrasting Water Status , 1998 .

[31]  H. Jones Plants and Microclimate: Other environmental factors: wind, altitude, climate change and atmospheric pollutants , 2013 .

[32]  John L. Monteith,et al.  A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity , 1995 .

[33]  R. Samson,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHETIC GAS EXCHANGE CHARACTERISTICS IN THREE DIFFERENT ALMOND SPECIES DURING DROUGHT STRESS AND SUBSEQUENT RECOVERY , 2007 .

[34]  I. Klein,et al.  Effects of irrigation deprivation during the harvest period on leaf persistence and function in mature almond trees. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[35]  D. Smart,et al.  Yield-scaled global warming potential from N2O emissions and CH4 oxidation for almond (Prunus dulcis) irrigated with nitrogen fertilizers on arid land , 2012 .

[36]  T. Meyers,et al.  Investigations with a higher-order canopy turbulence model into mean source-sink levels and bulk canopy resistances , 1989 .

[37]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox , 1991 .

[38]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method , 2006 .

[39]  Janine Hasey,et al.  Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees , 1997 .

[40]  T. Hsiao,et al.  Maize canopies under two soil water regimes: II. Seasonal trends of evapotranspiration, carbon dioxide assimilation and canopy conductance, and as related to leaf area index , 1998 .