AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation

Abstract An important challenge in structural reliability is to keep to a minimum the number of calls to the numerical models. Engineering problems involve more and more complex computer codes and the evaluation of the probability of failure may require very time-consuming computations. Metamodels are used to reduce these computation times. To assess reliability, the most popular approach remains the numerous variants of response surfaces. Polynomial Chaos [1] and Support Vector Machine [2] are also possibilities and have gained considerations among researchers in the last decades. However, recently, Kriging, originated from geostatistics, have emerged in reliability analysis. Widespread in optimisation, Kriging has just started to appear in uncertainty propagation [3] and reliability [4] , [5] studies. It presents interesting characteristics such as exact interpolation and a local index of uncertainty on the prediction which can be used in active learning methods. The aim of this paper is to propose an iterative approach based on Monte Carlo Simulation and Kriging metamodel to assess the reliability of structures in a more efficient way. The method is called AK-MCS for Active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation. It is shown to be very efficient as the probability of failure obtained with AK-MCS is very accurate and this, for only a small number of calls to the performance function. Several examples from literature are performed to illustrate the methodology and to prove its efficiency particularly for problems dealing with high non-linearity, non-differentiability, non-convex and non-connex domains of failure and high dimensionality.

[1]  Ten-Lin Liu,et al.  Additional sampling based on regulation threshold and kriging variance to reduce the probability of false delineation in a contaminated site. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization : state of the art , 1997 .

[4]  George Michailidis,et al.  Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes , 2008, Technometrics.

[5]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems , 2007 .

[6]  P. H. Waarts,et al.  Structural reliability using Finite Element Analysis - An appraisel of DARS : Directional Adaptive Response surface Sampling , 2000 .

[7]  B. Sudret,et al.  An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering , 2011 .

[9]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[11]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[12]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  L. Swiler,et al.  Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation , 2004 .

[14]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[15]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[16]  Aimo A. Törn,et al.  Global Optimization , 1999, Science.

[17]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[18]  C. D. Perttunen,et al.  Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant , 1993 .

[19]  Luc Schueremans,et al.  Use of Kriging as Meta-Model in simulation procedures for structural reliability , 2005 .

[20]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[21]  L. Schueremans,et al.  Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Comparison of finite element reliability methods , 2002 .

[23]  A. Land,et al.  An Automatic Method for Solving Discrete Programming Problems , 1960, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[24]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Designs for Computer Experiments , 1989 .

[25]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[26]  M. Eldred,et al.  The promise and peril of uncertainty quantification using response surface approximations , 2005 .

[27]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[28]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[29]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  Aspects of the Matlab toolbox DACE , 2002 .

[30]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[31]  Alessandro Rizzo,et al.  Kriging metamodel management in the design optimization of a CNG injection system , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[32]  D. Dennis,et al.  A statistical method for global optimization , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.