The effect of quality of rendering on user lighting impressions and presence in virtual environments

A between groups experiment was carried out to explore the effect of rendering quality on subjective impressions of illumination and perceived presence after exposure to a Virtual Environment (VE). The computer graphics scenes were rendered in varied levels of shadow accuracy utilising flat-shaded and radiosity rendering and were displayed on a stereo, head tracked Head Mounted Display (HMD). A total of 36 participants were exposed to each experimental visual condition and after completing a spatial task, they were given two questionnaires: A presence questionnaire and a questionnaire investigating subjective responses to lighting. Relevant results show a positive correlation between presence and subjective impressions of lighting (e.g. 'warm', 'comfortable', 'spacious', etc.) associated to the high-quality, full-shadow accuracy rendering condition. How real-world responses for both presence and lighting could be incorporated into a computer graphics simulation is still an open research question.

[1]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[2]  Christine D. Piatko,et al.  Comparing Real and Synthetic Images: Some Ideas about Metrics , 1995, Rendering Techniques.

[3]  J. E. Flynn.  A study of subjective responses to low energy and non-uniform lighting systems , 1977 .

[4]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Presence and distal attribution: phenomenology, determinants, and assessment , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Monitoring Navigational Strategies and Idle Time in Real and Virtual Environments : An Experimental Study , 2002 .

[7]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Tutorial 4: Usability Evaluation Techniques for Virtual Reality Technologies , 2001, VR.

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  Aikaterini Mania,et al.  Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations based on Human Judgements of Spatial Memory Awareness States , 2001 .

[10]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Connections between lighting impressions and presence in real and virtual environments: an experimental study , 2001, AFRIGRAPH '01.

[11]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[12]  Frederick P. Brooks.  What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Virtual Laboratories: Comparability of Real and Virtual Environments for Environmental Psychology , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Michael Meehan Computer.  An Objective Surrogate for Presence : Physiological Response , 2006 .

[16]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations Based on Spatial Memory Awareness States , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Memory and Presence in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centered Approach , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  David W. Schloerb,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Telepresence , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Usability evaluation techniques for virtual reality technologies , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.