Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient self-administered outcome data using touch-screen computers in a routine out-patient clinic. METHODS Forty patients with RA completed the touch-screen and paper Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQol) in the clinic and rated ease of use and preference. Forty-five others completed the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain, fatigue and global arthritis activity on touch screen and paper and a joint assessment on touch screen. They rated ease of use and willingness to complete the assessment again. Joints were independently assessed, and completion times and technical problems recorded. RESULTS No technical problems were encountered. The touch-screen RAQol took no longer to complete, was preferred by 64% (33% had no preference) and was rated significantly higher for ease of use (two-tailed P=0.003, n=40) even by computer naïve patients (two-tailed P=0.031, n=24). Intraclass correlation coefficients between methods were high for RAQol (0.986) and tender joint counts (0.918), and as high for the pain, fatigue and global activity (0.855, 0.741, 0.881) as for test-retest of the paper versions (0.865, 0.746, 0.863). Ninety-eight per cent rated the touch screen very/quite easy for HAQ and VAS, and 90% for joint assessment. Ninety-six per cent stated a willingness to complete the touch-screen assessment in clinic again. CONCLUSIONS Touch-screen questionnaires in the clinic can produce comparable results to paper, eliminate the need for data entry and afford immediate access to results. It is an acceptable, and in many cases a preferable, option to paper, regardless of age and previous experience of computers.

[1]  R. Ursano,et al.  Listening to the Patient , 2008 .

[2]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  D. V. D. Heijde,et al.  The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. , 1997, British journal of rheumatology.

[4]  D. Osoba,et al.  Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[5]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  F. Wolfe,et al.  Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  N. Leidy,et al.  A Comparative Trial of Paper-and-Pencil Versus Computer Administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) Questionnaire , 2001, Medical care.

[8]  W. Otten,et al.  A system of networks and continuing education for physical therapists in rheumatology: a feasibility study , 2004, International journal of integrated care.

[9]  D. Forman,et al.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  G. Stucki,et al.  A patient-derived disease activity score can substitute for a physician-derived disease activity score in clinical research. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[11]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  Leonard Goldschmidt,et al.  Development and evaluation of a point-of-care interactive patient education kiosk , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  T. V. Vliet Vlieland,et al.  The validity of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL) questionnaire. , 2001, Rheumatology.

[14]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods of Assessing Disease Activity in the Joints , 2001, Nursing research.

[15]  P. van Riel,et al.  Joint counts in routine practice. , 2003, Rheumatology.

[16]  R Madhok,et al.  The use of the Internet as a resource for health information among patients attending a rheumatology clinic. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[17]  F. Guillemin Functional disability and quality-of-life assessment in clinical practice. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[18]  L. Carlson,et al.  Computerized Quality-of-Life Screening in a Cancer Pain Clinic , 2001, Journal of palliative care.

[19]  W. van Lankveld,et al.  Disease related use of the internet in chronically ill adults: current and expected use , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[20]  P. Selby,et al.  Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  George D. Kitas,et al.  Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[22]  Leslie Lenert,et al.  A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[23]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  T. Pincus,et al.  A simplified twenty-eight-joint quantitative articular index in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.