What is the relationship between changes in canopy leaf area and changes in photosynthetic CO2 flux in arctic ecosystems?

1 The arctic environment is highly heterogeneous in terms of plant distribution and productivity. If we are to make regional scale predictions of carbon exchange it is necessary to find robust relationships that can simplify this variability. One such potential relationship is that of leaf area to photosynthetic CO2 flux at the canopy scale. 2 In this paper we assess the effectiveness of canopy leaf area in explaining variation in gross primary productivity (GPP): (i) across different vegetation types; (ii) at various stages of leaf development; and (iii) under enhanced nutrient availability. To do this we measure net CO2 flux light response curves with a 1 × 1 m chamber, and calculate GPP at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 600 µmol m−2 s−1. 3 At a subarctic site in Sweden, we report 10‐fold variation in GPP among natural vegetation types with leaf area index (LAI) values of 0.05–2.31 m2 m−2. At a site of similar latitude in Alaska we document substantially elevated rates of GPP in fertilized vegetation. 4 We can explain 80% of the observed variation in GPP in natural vegetation (including vegetation measured before deciduous leaf bud burst) by leaf area alone, when leaf area is predicted from measurements of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). 5 In fertilized vegetation the relative increase in leaf area between control and fertilized treatments exceeds the relative increase in GPP. This suggests that higher leaf area causes increased self‐shading, or that lower leaf nitrogen per unit leaf area causes a reduction in the rate of photosynthesis. 6 The results of this study indicate that canopy leaf area is an excellent predictor of GPP in diverse low arctic tundra, across a wide range of plant functional types.

[1]  J. Welker,et al.  Modeling the effect of photosynthetic vegetation properties on the NDVI--LAI relationship. , 2006, Ecology.

[2]  M. Wijk,et al.  Identifying Differences in Carbon Exchange among Arctic Ecosystem Types , 2006, Ecosystems.

[3]  S. Hobbie,et al.  Species compositional differences on different‐aged glacial landscapes drive contrasting responses of tundra to nutrient addition , 2005 .

[4]  M. Williams,et al.  OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING LEAF AREA INDEX IN LOW VEGETATION: APPLICATION IN ARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS , 2005 .

[5]  Marc Stieglitz,et al.  Inter-annual variability of NDVI in response to long-term warming and fertilization in wet sedge and tussock tundra , 2005, Oecologia.

[6]  F. Chapin,et al.  Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization , 2004, Nature.

[7]  M. Williams,et al.  Tight coupling between leaf area index and foliage N content in arctic plant 1 communities 2 3 , 2004 .

[8]  Arctic Monitoring,et al.  Impacts of a warming Arctic : Arctic Climate Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[9]  Acia Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[10]  Mark T. van Wijk,et al.  Tight coupling between leaf area index and foliage N content in arctic plant communities , 2004, Oecologia.

[11]  S. Hobbie,et al.  Responses of moist non-acidic arctic tundra to altered environment: productivity, biomass, and species richness , 2003 .

[12]  J. Gamon,et al.  Response of NDVI, biomass, and ecosystem gas exchange to long-term warming and fertilization in wet sedge tundra , 2003, Oecologia.

[13]  M. Weiss,et al.  Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Soils from Acidic and Nonacidic Tundra with Different Glacial Histories in Northern Alaska , 2002, Ecosystems.

[14]  Zoe G. Cardon,et al.  Corrected calculations for soil and ecosystem measurements of CO2 flux using the LI-COR 6200 portable photosynthesis system , 2002, Oecologia.

[15]  G. R. Shaver,et al.  Dry Heath Arctic Tundra Responses to Long-term Nutrient and Light Manipulation , 2002 .

[16]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity , 2001 .

[17]  M. Sturm,et al.  Climate change: Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic , 2001, Nature.

[18]  U. Molau,et al.  Leaf-trait Variation of Tundra Plants along a Climatic Gradient: An Integration of Responses in Evergreen and Deciduous Species , 2001 .

[19]  David W. Kicklighter,et al.  Modelling carbon responses of tundra ecosystems to historical and projected climate: sensitivity of pan‐Arctic carbon storage to temporal and spatial variation in climate , 2000, Global change biology.

[20]  E. Rastetter,et al.  PLANT CARBON–NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS CONTROL CO2 EXCHANGE IN ALASKAN WET SEDGE TUNDRA ECOSYSTEMS , 2000 .

[21]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Vegetation characteristics and primary productivity along an arctic transect: implications for scaling‐up , 1999 .

[22]  E. Rastetter,et al.  BIOMASS AND CO2 FLUX IN WET SEDGE TUNDRAS: RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS, TEMPERATURE, AND LIGHT , 1998 .

[23]  C. Tucker,et al.  Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991 , 1997, Nature.

[24]  F. Chapin,et al.  Long-term responses to factorial, NPK fertilizer treatment by Alaskan wet and moist tundra sedge species , 1995 .

[25]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate , 1995 .

[26]  Donald A. Walker,et al.  Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska , 1994 .

[27]  Walter C. Oechel,et al.  Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source , 1993, Nature.

[28]  F. Chapin,et al.  Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types , 1991 .

[29]  W. Oechel,et al.  7 – Effects of Global Change on the Carbon Balance of Arctic Plants and Ecosystems , 1991 .

[30]  W. Oechel,et al.  Maximum CO2‐assimilation rates of vascular plants on an Alaskan arctic tundra slope , 1989 .

[31]  F. Chapin,et al.  Effect of Fertilizer on Production and Biomass of Tussock Tundra, Alaska, U.S.A. , 1986 .

[32]  P. Miller,et al.  Seasonal dynamics and standing crops of biomass and nutrients in a subarctic tundra vegetation , 1982 .

[33]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: nutrient accumulation and growth , 1980 .