Primary Care Providers’ Perspectives on Online Weight-Loss Programs: A Big Wish List

Background Integrating online weight-loss programs into the primary care setting could yield substantial public health benefit. Little is known about primary care providers’ perspectives on online weight-loss programs. Objective To assess primary care providers’ perspectives on online weight-loss programs. Methods We conducted focus group discussions with providers in family medicine, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine/pediatrics in Texas and Pennsylvania, USA. Open-ended questions addressed their experience with and attitudes toward online weight-loss programs; useful characteristics of existing online weight-loss programs; barriers to referring patients to online weight-loss programs; and preferred characteristics of an ideal online weight-loss program. Transcripts were analyzed with the grounded theory approach to identify major themes. Results A total of 44 primary care providers participated in 9 focus groups. The mean age was 45 (SD 9) years. Providers had limited experience with structured online weight-loss programs and were uncertain about their safety and efficacy. They thought motivated, younger patients would be more likely than others to respond to an online weight-loss program. According to primary care providers, an ideal online weight-loss program would provide—at no cost to the patient—a structured curriculum addressing motivation, psychological issues, and problem solving; tools for tracking diet, exercise, and weight loss; and peer support monitored by experts. Primary care providers were interested in receiving reports about patients from the online weight-loss programs, but were concerned about the time required to review and act on the reports. Conclusions Primary care providers have high expectations for how online weight-loss programs should deliver services to patients and fit into the clinical workflow. Efforts to integrate online weight-loss programs into the primary care setting should address efficacy and safety of online weight-loss programs in clinic-based populations; acceptable methods of sending reports to primary care providers about their patients’ progress; and elimination or reduction of costs to patients.

[1]  Alan VanBiervliet,et al.  Internet delivered behavioral obesity treatment. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[2]  R. Rubin,et al.  Access to Diabetes Self-management Education , 2009, The Diabetes educator.

[3]  R. Winett,et al.  Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. , 2001, JAMA.

[4]  D. Tate,et al.  Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: population based study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Jean Harvey-Berino,et al.  Minimal in-person support as an adjunct to internet obesity treatment , 2007, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[6]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Family Physicians' Practices and Attitudes Regarding Care of Extremely Obese Patients , 2009, Obesity.

[7]  J. Harvey-Berino,et al.  Weight Loss on the Web: A Pilot Study Comparing a Structured Behavioral Intervention to a Commercial Program , 2007, Obesity.

[8]  S. Woolf,et al.  Patient costs as a barrier to intensive health behavior counseling. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  D. Tate,et al.  Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  U. P. S. T. Force Screening for Obesity in Adults: Recommendations and Rationale , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  Kevin O. Hwang,et al.  Quality of weight loss advice on internet forums. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Neve,et al.  Effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta‐analysis , 2010, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[13]  Rachel Hess,et al.  Using the internet to translate an evidence-based lifestyle intervention into practice. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  Jason Rivas,et al.  Key principles in internet-based weight management systems. , 2010, American journal of health behavior.

[15]  Gary G Bennett,et al.  Web‐based Weight Loss in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Obesity.

[16]  S. Zickmund,et al.  Patient perspectives on the integration of an intensive online behavioral weight loss intervention into primary care. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  Jean Harvey-Berino,et al.  Effect of internet support on the long-term maintenance of weight loss. , 2004, Obesity research.

[18]  J. Hood,et al.  Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory , 2007 .

[19]  Terry Davis,et al.  Physicians’ Weight Loss Counseling in Two Public Hospital Primary Care Clinics , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  Elmer V. Bernstam,et al.  Comparing clinician knowledge and online information regarding Alli (Orlistat) , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[22]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[23]  Jean Harvey-Berino,et al.  Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[24]  Elmer V. Bernstam,et al.  Social support in an Internet weight loss community , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  B. Spring,et al.  New and Emerging Weight Management Strategies for Busy Ambulatory Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Endorsed by the Society of Behavioral Medicine , 2011, Circulation.