Comparative Performance of Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning Algorithms in Predicting Gas–Liquid Flow Regimes

Gas–liquid flow is a significant phenomenon in various engineering applications, such as in nuclear reactors, power plants, chemical industries, and petroleum industries. The prediction of the flow patterns is of great importance for designing and analyzing the operations of two-phase pipeline systems. The traditional numerical and empirical methods that have been used for the prediction are known to result in a high inaccuracy for scale-up processes. That is why various artificial intelligence-based (AI-based) methodologies are being applied, at present, to predict the gas–liquid flow regimes. We focused in the current study on a thorough comparative analysis of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in predicting the flow regimes with the application of a diverse set of ML and DL frameworks to a database comprising 11,837 data points, which were collected from thirteen independent experiments. During the pre-processing, the big data analysis was performed to analyze the correlations among the parameters and extract important features. The comparative analysis of the AI-based models’ performances was conducted using precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, Cohen’s kappa, and receiver operating characteristics curves. The extreme gradient boosting method was identified as the optimum model for predicting the two-phase flow regimes in inclined or horizontal pipelines.

[1]  M. Maučec,et al.  GeoDIN - Geoscience-Based Deep Interaction Networks for Predicting Flow Dynamics in Reservoir Simulation Models , 2022, SPE Journal.

[2]  Reinel Tabares-Soto,et al.  Machine learning applications to predict two-phase flow patterns , 2021, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[3]  R. Gajbhiye,et al.  Effects of Density, Viscosity and Surface Tension on Flow Regimes and Pressure Drop of Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes , 2021 .

[4]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Machine learning classification of flow regimes in a long pipeline-riser system with differential pressure signal , 2021 .

[5]  Zeeshan Rana,et al.  Pseudo-image-feature-based identification benchmark for multi-phase flow regimes , 2021 .

[6]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Optimization of differential pressure signal acquisition for recognition of gas–liquid two-phase flow patterns in pipeline-riser system , 2021 .

[7]  Xiaolei Liu,et al.  Prediction of two-phase flow patterns in upward inclined pipes via deep learning , 2020, Energy.

[8]  Ke-wei Xu,et al.  Two-phase flow regime identification based on the liquid-phase velocity information and machine learning , 2020, Experiments in Fluids.

[9]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Intelligent recognition of severe slugging in a long-distance pipeline-riser system , 2020 .

[10]  Wensheng Li,et al.  Study of identification of global flow regime in a long pipeline transportation system , 2020 .

[11]  Ke-wei Xu,et al.  Slug flow identification using ultrasound Doppler velocimetry , 2020 .

[12]  Ivar Eskerud Smith,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation through a Point Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Pipe Flow , 2020, Algorithms.

[13]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning of Subsurface Flow via Theory-guided Neural Network , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[14]  Haesang Yang,et al.  Monitoring Severe Slugging in Pipeline-Riser System Using Accelerometers for Application in Early Recognition , 2019, Sensors.

[15]  Yi Cao,et al.  Identification of gas-liquid flow regimes using a non-intrusive Doppler ultrasonic sensor and virtual flow regime maps , 2019, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation.

[16]  H. Obata,et al.  Quantitative visualization of fluid mixing in slug flow for arbitrary wall-shaped microchannel using Shannon entropy , 2019, Chemical Engineering Science.

[17]  Li Liu,et al.  Flow regime identification of swirling gas-liquid flow with image processing technique and neural networks , 2019, Chemical Engineering Science.

[18]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Identification of flow regime in a bubble column reactor with a combination of optical probe data and machine learning technique , 2019, Chemical Engineering Science: X.

[19]  Xingru Wu,et al.  An improved model for gas-liquid flow pattern prediction based on machine learning , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[20]  Gustavo M. Hobold,et al.  Machine learning classification of boiling regimes with low speed, direct and indirect visualization , 2018, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[21]  Alex Sherstinsky,et al.  Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network , 2018, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.

[22]  Maciej Kusy,et al.  Identification of liquid-gas flow regime in a pipeline using gamma-ray absorption technique and computational intelligence methods , 2018 .

[23]  Shubhankar Chakraborty,et al.  Visualization and flow regime identification of downward air–water flow through a 12 mm diameter vertical tube using image analysis , 2017 .

[24]  N Pappa,et al.  An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patterns with feature extracted from acquired images. , 2017, ISA transactions.

[25]  Bau-Shei Pei,et al.  Experimental investigation and identification of the transition boundary of churn and annular flows using multi-range differential pressure and conductivity signals , 2017 .

[26]  Hoi Yeung,et al.  Non-invasive classification of gas–liquid two-phase horizontal flow regimes using an ultrasonic Doppler sensor and a neural network , 2016 .

[27]  Zhongheng Zhang,et al.  Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[28]  Dilip Kumar Pratihar,et al.  Identification of flow regimes using conductivity probe signals and neural networks for counter-current gas–liquid two-phase flow , 2012 .

[29]  I. Indarto,et al.  The Identification of Gas-liquid Co-current Two Phase Flow Pattern in a Horizontal Pipe Using the Power Spectral Density and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) , 2012 .

[30]  Suresh V. Garimella,et al.  Electrical impedance-based void fraction measurement and flow regime identification in microchannel flows under adiabatic conditions , 2012 .

[31]  P. Hanafizadeh,et al.  Intelligent Image-Based Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Regime Recognition , 2012 .

[32]  Eduardo Pereyra,et al.  A methodology and database to quantify the confidence level of methods for gas–liquid two-phase flow pattern prediction , 2012 .

[33]  M. Ishii,et al.  Flow Regime Identification Under Adiabatic Upward Two-Phase Flow in a Vertical Rod Bundle Geometry , 2011 .

[34]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Flow regime development analysis in adiabatic upward two-phase flow in a vertical annulus , 2011 .

[35]  Takaaki Ohishi,et al.  Performance comparison of artificial neural networks and expert systems applied to flow pattern identification in vertical ascendant gas-liquid flows , 2010 .

[36]  Suresh V. Garimella,et al.  Boiling heat transfer and flow regimes in microchannels — a comprehensive understanding , 2009, 2009 15th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems.

[37]  Huaxiang Wang,et al.  Identification of two-phase flow regimes based on support vector machine and electrical capacitance tomography , 2009 .

[38]  Imre Pázsit,et al.  Non-invasive on-line two-phase flow regime identification employing artificial neural networks , 2009 .

[39]  Chunguo Jing,et al.  Improved void fraction measurement by flow regime identification for gas liquid two-phase flows , 2008, International Symposium on Instrumentation and Control Technology.

[40]  Feng Dong,et al.  Identification of gas/liquid two-phase flow regime through ERT-based measurement and feature extraction , 2007 .

[41]  J. E. Juliá,et al.  Fast classification of two-phase flow regimes based on conductivity signals and artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[42]  D. Ernst,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[43]  J. P. Brill,et al.  Unified model for gas-liquid pipe flow via slug dynamics: Part 1: Model development , 2003 .

[44]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Experimental study of two and three phase flows in large diameter inclined pipes , 2003 .

[45]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[46]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  Vertical two-phase flow identification using advanced instrumentation and neural networks , 1998 .

[47]  Ghassan H. Abdul-Majeed,et al.  Liquid holdup in horizontal two-phase gas—liquid flow , 1996 .

[48]  J. S. Archer,et al.  Neural network based objective flow regime identification in air-water two phase flow , 1994 .

[49]  J. P. Brill,et al.  Pressure Drop Correlations for Inclined Two-Phase Flow , 1985 .

[50]  H. Åsheim MONA, An Accurate Two-Phase Well Flow Model Based on Phase Slippage , 1984 .

[51]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Flow pattern characterization in two phase flow by electrical conductance probe , 1980 .

[52]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Flow pattern transition for gas-liquid flow in horizontal and inclined pipes. Comparison of experimental data with theory , 1980 .

[53]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[54]  James P. Brill,et al.  A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes , 1973 .

[55]  G. W. Govier,et al.  Pressure Drop In Wells Producing Oil And Gas , 1972 .

[56]  W. Dreyer,et al.  The molecular basis of antibody formation: a paradox. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  K. Brown,et al.  Experimental Study of Pressure Gradients Occurring During Continuous Two-Phase Flow in Small-Diameter Vertical Conduits , 1965 .

[58]  Xiaoyan Chen,et al.  Oil-in-Water Two-Phase Flow Pattern Identification From Experimental Snapshots Using Convolutional Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Access.

[59]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Fast recognition of global flow regime in pipeline-riser system by spatial correlation of differential pressures , 2017 .

[60]  Ana Maria Frattini Fileti,et al.  The use of an ultrasonic technique and neural networks for identification of the flow pattern and measurement of the gas volume fraction in multiphase flows , 2016 .

[61]  Guanghui Su,et al.  Applications of ANNs in flow and heat transfer problems in nuclear engineering: A review work , 2013 .

[62]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Multi-class AdaBoost ∗ , 2009 .

[63]  M. Ishii,et al.  Flow Regime Identification in Large Diameter Pipe , 2008 .

[64]  I. Pázsit,et al.  Classification of two-phase flow regimes via image analysis and a neuro-wavelet approach , 2005 .

[65]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Support-vector networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[66]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[67]  S. Rouhani,et al.  Two-phase flow patterns: A review of research results , 1983 .