Managing E-learning

This study analyses the behaviour of students and lecturers activities in an e-learning using Moodle course logs and pivot table. Moodle course logs are mined and subsequently are integrated to be data pivoting toward visualization. The number of “view” and “update” activities are extracted from Moodle course logs and are visualized into meaningful insight of elearning evaluation. There is high correlation between lectures and student in “update” activity. Its similarity in activity trends between lecturers and students provides an opportunity to build a preliminary hypothesis that lecturer activity will affect student activity in an asynchronous e-learning model. Meanwhile, the correlation value between “views” and “update” activities was low within lecturer activities. Several rationalities are discussed in this study. The most performed activity by lecturers is File while the Lesson is the least activity. The future work of research is that “views” and “update” are an indicators of student and lecturer participation where its amount have been said to be an important predictor of engagement and success in running elearning. Keywords—view, update, moodle, log data

[1]  Index , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[2]  Rosalina R. Estacio,et al.  Analyzing students online learning behavior in blended courses using Moodle , 2017, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.

[3]  Il-Hyun Jo,et al.  Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory , 2017 .

[5]  Berner Lindström,et al.  Quality in e-learning: a framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Ramón Fabregat,et al.  Activity-Based Learner-Models for Learner Monitoring and Recommendations in Moodle , 2011, EC-TEL.

[7]  Ian Roffe,et al.  E‐learning: engagement, enhancement and execution , 2002 .

[8]  Nancy Law,et al.  Understanding collaborative learning behavior from Moodle log data , 2012, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[9]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Konomu Dobashi,et al.  Development and Trial of Excel Macros for Time Series Cross Section Monitoring of Student Engagement: Analyzing Students' Page Views of Course Materials , 2016, KES.

[11]  Badrul H. Khan Interface Design Issues , 2005 .

[12]  Akalanka Karunarathne Mudiyanselage,et al.  Security test MOODLE: a penetration testing case study , 2017 .

[13]  David Jones,et al.  Indicators of engagement , 2010 .

[14]  Yves Duthen,et al.  Analysis of students clustering results based on Moodle log data , 2013, EDM.

[15]  Konomu Dobashi,et al.  Automatic data integration from Moodle course logs to pivot tables for time series cross section analysis , 2017, KES.

[16]  Jin Soung Yoo,et al.  Exploring online students’ self-regulated learning with self-reported surveys and log files: a data mining approach , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..