Helping people assess the health risks from lifestyle choices: Comparing a computer decision aid with customized printed alternative

Abstract Decisions about lifestyle play a key role in influencing health. Illnesses such as heart disease result from combinations of factors, making it hard for people to evaluate alternatives (e.g., knowing how much exercise might give similar benefit to eating more fruit and vegetables). Computers can provide customized risk leaflets and interactive displays, which may encourage people to explore potential lifestyle changes by showing the consequences for future health of specific combinations of lifestyle changes. This empirical study invited 24 adult volunteers to use the information from a customized leaflet or interactive display to advise hypothetical patients about lifestyle changes. Advisers used both leaflet and computer for different patients, with order counterbalanced across volunteers. It was found that more combinations of lifestyle factors were explored with the interactive display, especially by the younger volunteers, without this taking more time. Most of the older volunteers preferred interacting with the computer, and rated it as easier to use than the leaflet. It is concluded that easy to use computer interfaces can be devised that help people explore the health consequences of personal decisions about lifestyle, and that people prefer interactive assistance rather than using printed alternatives.

[1]  T. Dawber,et al.  The Framingham Study: The Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Disease , 1980 .

[2]  L D Cohn,et al.  Adolescents' misinterpretation of health risk probability expressions. , 1995, Pediatrics.

[3]  G. DeFriese,et al.  Knowledge of risk among patients at increased risk for stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[4]  C. Silagy,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice. , 1997, Family practice.

[5]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Communicating cancer risk information: the challenges of uncertainty. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[8]  Patrick Vallance,et al.  A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing , 1999, BMJ.

[9]  V. Strecher Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  G. Elwyn,et al.  The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine. , 1999, JAMA.

[11]  Yellowlees Cybermedicine: how computing empowers doctors and patients for better health care , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  J Pearson,et al.  Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients , 1999, BMJ.

[13]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information , 2000, The Lancet.

[15]  James J. Cimino Clinical Knowledge and Practice in the Information Age: A Handbook for Health Professionals , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  H. Purcell,et al.  Management of overweight and obesity in patients with cardiovascular disease , 2002 .

[17]  R. Say Shared Decision Making. Patient Involvement in Clinical Practice , 2002 .

[18]  G. Elwyn,et al.  One hundred years ago: Should milk be boiled? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Patricia Wright,et al.  Designing an interactive decision explorer , 2003 .

[20]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[21]  Chris John,et al.  Fancy Graphics Can Deter Older Users: A Comparison of Two Interfaces for Exploring Healthy Lifestyle Options , 2004 .

[22]  J. Chabot [Changing behaviour]. , 2005, La Revue du praticien.