Deregulation of the Russian railway freight market - learning from empirical results

Railway transport has confronted various changes during the last decades. Although the trend of deregulation spread worldwide in 1990s, Russia belongs to countries which have not totally liberalised market. Russian railway market has developed significantly since 2001 and today there are almost 2,000 companies offering railway services. However, the traction market's deregulation process is still incomplete. The market is confronting notable changes during the coming years. This research's main objective is to evaluate the progression of deregulation in the Russian railway freight market, highlight the confronted market entry barriers and reveal the national peculiarities. Research findings strengthen former knowledge and fortifies the Russian railway freight market has many national characteristics. As the main traits was noted importance of personal relations and close linkage with politics. Although market has many operators, undertakings are mainly leasing companies providing rolling stock for their customers. When considering the barriers to entry, as main hindering factors were regarded rolling stock, bureaucracy and needed capital. These follow the same path which has been noted in previous studies; Although Russian railway freight market has strong national peculiarities, the barriers to entry are the same like in Europe.

[1]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[2]  Makeda F Jahanshahi,et al.  The US railroad industry and open access , 1998 .

[3]  Arne Jensen,et al.  Economic Impacts of Swedish Railway Deregulation: A Longitudinal Study , 2007 .

[4]  Bulcsu Szekely,et al.  The liberalization process in Europe : market entry barriers versus competition stimulation : cases of Germany and Hungary , 2009 .

[5]  R. Pittman Blame the Switchman? Russian Railways Restructuring after Ten Years , 2011 .

[6]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[7]  Andrew Grantham Expanding to Exploit an Open Market , 2008 .

[8]  Miika Mäkitalo Market Entry and the Change in Rail Transport Market when Domestic Freight Transport Opens to Competition in Finland , 2007 .

[9]  O. Hilmola,et al.  Stimulating competition in the liberalized railway freight market , 2012 .

[10]  Guido Friebel,et al.  Railroad Restructuring in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe: One Solution for All Problems? , 2007 .

[11]  Peter R Brewer,et al.  Contestability in UK rail freight markets: The economics of open access , 1996 .

[12]  W. Rosenberg The Democratization of Russia's Railroads in 1917 , 1981 .

[13]  Bulcsu Szekely Liberalisation of the railway industry in Europe: toward a sustainable system through process view , 2009 .

[14]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Deregulation of railroads and future development scenarios in Europe: analysis of the privatisation process taken place in the USA, the UK and Sweden , 2007 .

[15]  David G. Tarr,et al.  Regional Impacts of Liberalization of Barriers Against Foreign Direct Investment in Services: The Case of Russia's Accession to the WTO , 2010 .

[16]  H. Broadman Reducing Structural Dominance and Entry Barriers in Russian Industry , 1999 .

[17]  R. Haywood The beginnings of railway development in Russia in the reign of Nicholas I, 1835-1842 , 1969 .

[18]  Szekely Bulcsu The process of liberalising the rail freight transport markets in the EU: The case of Hungary , 2011 .

[19]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Deregulation of Railroads and Future Development Scenarios in Europe - Literature Analysis of Privatization Process Taken Place in US, UK and Sweden , 2006 .

[20]  Milla Laisi Market entry strategies and confronted barriers on liberalized railway freight markets in Sweden and Poland , 2009 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[22]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Using Eurasian Landbridge in Logistics Operations : Building Knowledge through Case Studies , 2007 .

[23]  A. Åslund Why Doesn't Russia Join the WTO? , 2010 .

[24]  J Ludvigsen,et al.  Liberalisation of Rail Freight Markets in the Old and New EU-Member States , 2009 .

[25]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Methodological pluralism in case study research: an analysis of contemporary operations management and logistics research , 2005 .

[26]  R. Pittman Make or buy on the Russian railway? Coase, Williamson, and Tsar Nicholas II , 2007 .

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[28]  C. Balding Joining the World Trade Organization: What is the Impact? , 2010 .

[29]  V. Sal’nikov,et al.  Technological modernization trends of leading branches of Russian industry , 2008 .

[30]  Vladimir Yakunin Upgrading paves the way for network expansion , 2009 .

[31]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[32]  From Northern Europe to Russia and Asia, and vice versa: traffic flow analysis - current situation and development trends , 2010 .

[33]  Milla Laisi Barriers to entry in railway freight market: building knowledge through Swedish and Polish operators' experiences , 2011 .

[34]  Yan Wang,et al.  China's Pattern of Trade and Growth after WTO Accession : Lessons for Other Developing Countries , 2009 .

[35]  A. Woodburn Appropriate indicators of rail freight activity and market share: a review of UK practice and recommendations for change , 2007 .

[36]  R. Yin The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[37]  Yulia Panova,et al.  Dynamics of Russian dry ports , 2011 .