Molecular modelling prediction of ligand binding site flexibility

We have investigated the efficacy of generating multiple sidechain conformations using a rotamer library in order to find the experimentally observed ligand binding site conformation of a protein in the presence of a bound ligand. We made use of a recently published algorithm that performs an exhaustive conformational search using a rotamer library to enumerate all possible sidechain conformations in a binding site. This approach was applied to a dataset of proteins whose structures were determined by X-ray and NMR methods. All chosen proteins had two or more structures, generally involving different bound ligands. By taking one of these structures as a reference, we were able in most cases to successfully reproduce the experimentally determined conformations of the other structures, as well as to suggest alternative low-energy conformations of the binding site. In those few cases where this procedure failed, we observed that the bound ligand had induced a high-energy conformation of the binding site. These results suggest that for most proteins that exhibit limited backbone motion, ligands tend to bind to low energy conformations of their binding sites. Our results also reveal that it is possible in most cases to use a rotamer search-based approach to predict alternative low-energy protein binding site conformations that can be used by different ligands. This opens the possibility of incorporating alternative binding site conformations to improve the efficacy of docking and structure-based drug design algorithms.

[1]  C. Laughton,et al.  Prediction of protein side-chain conformations from local three-dimensional homology relationships. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Philip M Dean,et al.  Efficient conformational sampling of local side-chain flexibility. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  M. Levitt,et al.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding , 2000, Proteins.

[6]  Per Källblad,et al.  Receptor flexibility in the in silico screening of reagents in the S1' pocket of human collagenase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  A. Sali,et al.  Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  T. Bhat,et al.  An analysis of side-chain conformation in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[12]  J. Tainer,et al.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.

[13]  P. Argos,et al.  Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  M. Llinás,et al.  Solution structure and dynamics of the plasminogen kringle 2-AMCHA complex: 3(1)-helix in homologous domains. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[17]  Thomas M Frimurer,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Roland L. Dunbrack Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  P Tuffery,et al.  FORME: an interactive package for protein backbone deformation. , 1991, Journal of molecular graphics.

[20]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  P. Koehl,et al.  Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  L J Smith,et al.  Side-chains in native and random coil protein conformations. Analysis of NMR coupling constants and chi1 torsion angle preferences. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Eddy Arnold,et al.  On the detection of multiple-binding modes of ligands to proteins, from biological, structural, and modeling data , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[25]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Luc Van Meervelt,et al.  Two 1 : 1 binding modes for distamycin in the minor groove of d(GGCCAATTGG). , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  R M Stroud,et al.  Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.

[28]  M Karplus,et al.  Side-chain torsional potentials: effect of dipeptide, protein, and solvent environment. , 1979, Biochemistry.