Dominant Flow Structures in Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds Using Time and Frequency Domains Analyses

Time series analysis techniques in time domain and average cycle frequency were applied to characterize bubbling fluidization. The experiments were carried out in a laboratory scale fluidized bed, operated under ambient conditions and various sizes of particles, measurement heights, and different superficial gas velocities. It was found that a minimum in average cycle frequency and flatness and a shift of skewness from negative to positive against velocity correspond to shift from macrostructures and finer structures of the flow rather than transition velocity from the bubbling to turbulent regime. The power spectrum estimation of the measured pressure fluctuations shows that the peak dominant frequency of the pressure fluctuations is about 1.5–2.5 Hz which is corresponding to the macrostructures of the bed. Accordingly, the onset of turbulent fluidization regime was detected through standard deviation analysis. It was shown that the simple analysis techniques still have interesting information about hydrodynamics of fluidization and they can accurately estimate transition between dominant flow structures of a gas–solid fluidized bed.

[1]  Navid Mostoufi,et al.  Characterization of various structures in gas-solid fluidized beds by recurrence quantification analysis , 2013 .

[2]  N. Mostoufi,et al.  Characterization of Regime Transition in Fluidized Beds at High Velocities by Analysis of Vibration Signals , 2012 .

[3]  Navid Mostoufi,et al.  Characterization of gas-solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics by vibration signature analysis , 2011 .

[4]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations in gas–solid fluidized beds – A review , 2011 .

[5]  C. Sobrino,et al.  Standard deviation of absolute and differential pressure fluctuations in fluidized beds of group B particles , 2008 .

[6]  Sandra Rocha,et al.  Prediction of minimum fluidization velocity of gas–solid fluidized beds by pressure fluctuation measurements — Analysis of the standard deviation methodology , 2007 .

[7]  M. Puncochár,et al.  Origin of pressure fluctuations in fluidized beds , 2005 .

[8]  Jc Jaap Schouten,et al.  Similarity between chaos analysis and frequency analysis of pressure fluctuations in fluidized beds , 2004 .

[9]  H. Bi,et al.  Pressure fluctuations and transition from bubbling to turbulent fluidization , 2003 .

[10]  S. D. Kim,et al.  Experimental, statistical and stochastic studies of pressure fluctuations in a three-phase fluidized bed with a moderately large diameter , 2003 .

[11]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Non-intrusive determination of bubble and slug length scales in fluidized beds by decomposition of the power spectral density of pressure time series , 2002 .

[12]  C. Briens,et al.  Cycle detection and characterization in chemical engineering , 2002 .

[13]  H. Bi,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review of Gas-Solid Turbulent Fluidization , 2000 .

[14]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Characterization of fluidization regimes by time-series analysis of pressure fluctuations , 2000 .

[15]  John R. Grace,et al.  Transition from bubbling to turbulent fluidization , 1995 .

[16]  H. Bi,et al.  Effect of measurement method on the velocities used to demarcate the onset of turbulent fluidization , 1995 .

[17]  S. Saxena,et al.  Diagnostic procedures for establishing the quality of fluidization of gas-solid systems , 1993 .

[18]  J. Grace,et al.  The transition to turbulent fluidization : Chemical reaction engineering , 1992 .

[19]  Yong Jin,et al.  Mechanism of flow regime transition from bubbling to turbulent fluidization , 1990 .

[20]  S. D. Kim,et al.  Pressure fluctuations in turbulent fluidized beds , 1988 .