Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines

BackgroundThere are thousands of maize lines with distinctive normal as well as mutant phenotypes. To determine the validity of comparisons among mutants in different lines, we first address the question of how similar the transcriptomes are in three standard lines at four developmental stages.ResultsFour tissues (leaves, 1 mm anthers, 1.5 mm anthers, pollen) from one hybrid and one inbred maize line were hybridized with the W23 inbred on Agilent oligonucleotide microarrays with 21,000 elements. Tissue-specific gene expression patterns were documented, with leaves having the most tissue-specific transcripts. Haploid pollen expresses about half as many genes as the other samples. High overlap of gene expression was found between leaves and anthers. Anther and pollen transcript expression showed high conservation among the three lines while leaves had more divergence. Antisense transcripts represented about 6 to 14 percent of total transcriptome by tissue type but were similar across lines. Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were assigned and tabulated. Enrichment in GO terms related to cell-cycle functions was found for the identified antisense transcripts. Microarray results were validated via quantitative real-time PCR and by hybridization to a second oligonucleotide microarray platform.ConclusionDespite high polymorphisms and structural differences among maize inbred lines, the transcriptomes of the three lines displayed remarkable similarities, especially in both reproductive samples (anther and pollen). We also identified potential stage markers for maize anther development. A large number of antisense transcripts were detected and implicated in important biological functions given the enrichment of particular GO classes.

[1]  B. Gaut Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. , 2001, Genome research.

[2]  Michele Morgante,et al.  Evolution of DNA Sequence Nonhomologies among Maize Inbredsw⃞ , 2005, The Plant Cell Online.

[3]  A. Cigan,et al.  Phenotypic complementation of ms45 maize requires tapetal expression of MS45 , 2001, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[4]  V. Walbot,et al.  Rapid transcriptome responses of maize (Zea mays) to UV-B in irradiated and shielded tissues , 2004, Genome Biology.

[5]  H. Fu,et al.  Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Albertsen,et al.  Two male-sterile mutants of Zea Mays (Poaceae) with an extra cell division in the anther wall. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[7]  S. Gruvberger,et al.  BioArray Software Environment (BASE): a platform for comprehensive management and analysis of microarray data , 2002, Genome Biology.

[8]  T. A. Kiesselbach The structure and reproduction of corn , 1980 .

[9]  M. Oh,et al.  Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Nolwenn Le Meur,et al.  A dynamic, web-accessible resource to process raw microarray scan data into consolidated gene expression values: importance of replication. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  W. Tracy,et al.  Pedigree diversity within the Lancaster surecrop heterotic group of maize , 1993 .

[12]  M. Morgante,et al.  Gene duplication and exon shuffling by helitron-like transposons generate intraspecies diversity in maize , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  L. Hurst,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of coordinate expression and evolution of human cis-encoded sense-antisense transcripts. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  E. Petretto,et al.  Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Edward H. Coe,et al.  Mutants of Maize , 1997 .

[17]  C. Stuber Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[18]  N. Avratovščuková Gerdes, J.T., Behr, C.F., Coors, H.G., Tracy, W.F.: Compilation of North American Maize Breeding Germplasm , 1997, Biologia Plantarum.

[19]  V. Walbot,et al.  Gene Expression Profiling in Response to Ultraviolet Radiation in Maize Genotypes with Varying Flavonoid Content1[w] , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[20]  F. Bolivar,et al.  Antisense overlapping open reading frames in genes from bacteria to humans. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  A. J. Greenland,et al.  A maize pectin methylesterase-like gene, ZmC5, specifically expressed in pollen , 1998, Plant Molecular Biology.

[22]  Yangrae Cho,et al.  Gene-expression profile comparisons distinguish seven organs of maize , 2002, Genome Biology.

[23]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  Naturally occurring antisense: transcriptional leakage or real overlap? , 2005, Genome research.

[24]  Joachim Messing,et al.  Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Erez Y. Levanon,et al.  Widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in the human genome , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  R. Poethig Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. , 1988, Genetics.

[27]  R. Stoughton,et al.  Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Nicole C Riddle,et al.  Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  Terry Gaasterland,et al.  Genome-wide prediction and identification of cis-natural antisense transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, Genome Biology.

[30]  Dan Nettleton,et al.  Genetic Regulation of Gene Expression During Shoot Development in Arabidopsis , 2006, Genetics.

[31]  Russell G Foster,et al.  Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Yoshihide Hayashizaki,et al.  Antisense transcripts with FANTOM2 clone set and their implications for gene regulation. , 2003, Genome research.

[33]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments , 2004, FEBS letters.

[34]  Juan Miguel García-Gómez,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE Sequence analysis Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy , 2005 .

[35]  Srinivas Aluru,et al.  Quality assessment of maize assembled genomic islands (MAGIs) and large-scale experimental verification of predicted genes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Ben Lehner,et al.  In search of antisense. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.