Evaluation of effect of backfill particle size on installation damage reduction factors for geogrids

ABSTRACT: The reduction factors used to account for the impact of installation damage on the tensile strength of geogrids employed in mechanically stabilised earth (MSE) walls and reinforced embankments are usually obtained from field tests that simulate actual construction conditions. Although costly and time-consuming, site-specific field tests incorporate the damage mechanisms that may occur in geogrid reinforcements during installation. Several studies have developed empirical relationships for these reduction factors for use in design calculations, typically considering the effects of construction methods and the backfill soil gradation on the damage of geogrids having a given polymer type, manufacturing method, and weight per unit area. One of the issues with these relationships is how to quantify the backfill soil gradation in the empirical relationships. In this study, a series of field test sections were constructed using geogrids with two polymer types and a range of different weights per unit a...

[1]  Huang Ching-Chuan,et al.  Investigation of installation damage of some geogrids using laboratory tests , 2006 .

[2]  Victor Elias,et al.  Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines , 1997 .

[3]  C L Sampaco,et al.  MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH WALLS , 1995 .

[4]  Ryan R Berg,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-PRACTICE DESIGN OF SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS: NCMA'S THIRD EDITION MANUAL , 2007 .

[5]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Abrasion damage of geogrids induced by turbid flow , 2007 .

[6]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Analysis of installation damage tests for LRFD calibration of reinforced soil structures , 2011 .

[7]  V Elias,et al.  Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes , 1997 .

[8]  M Pinho-Lopes,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE COMBINED EFFECT OF INSTALLATION DAMAGE AND CREEP OF GEOSYNTHETICS - NEW RESULTS , 2002 .

[9]  Chiwan Wayne Hsieh,et al.  Installation Survivability of Flexible Geogrids in Various Pavement Subgrade Materials , 2001 .

[10]  J. H. Greenwood The Effect of Installation Damage on the Long-Term Design Strength of a Reinforcing Geosynthetic , 2002 .

[11]  Margarida Pinho-Lopes,et al.  Damage during instalation laboratory test. Influence of the type of granular material , 2004 .

[12]  G N Richardson FIELD EVALUATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC SURVIVABILITY IN AGGREGATE ROAD BASE , 1998 .

[13]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Geosynthetic Installation Damage Under Two Different Backfill Conditions , 1993 .

[14]  Rudolf Hufenus,et al.  Strength reduction factors due to installation damage of reinforcing geosynthetics , 2005 .

[15]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Laboratory simulation of installation damage of a geogrid , 2006 .

[16]  D. I. Bush,et al.  An Assessment of the Resistance of Tensar SR2 to Physical Damage during the Construction and Testing of a Reinforced Soil Wall , 1988 .

[17]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Characterization of Geosynthetic Load-Strain Behavior After Installation Damage , 1994 .

[18]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Combined Allowable Strength Reduction Factor for Geosynthetic Creep and Installation Damage , 1996 .