Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of the pediatric brain.

OBJECTIVE Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) has been suggested as an alternative to single-shot EPI for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with reduced distortion. However, clinical comparisons of readout-segmented EPI and EPI DWI are limited by unmatched imaging parameters and reconstruction procedures. Our goal was to compare the clinical utility of generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition (GRAPPA)-accelerated readout-segmented EPI DWI with GRAPPA-accelerated EPI DWI for visualization of the pediatric brain in regions prone to distortion, such as the orbit, skull base, and posterior fossa. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Thirty consecutive patients (mean age, 7.8 years) presenting with orbital, skull base, and posterior fossa neuropathologic abnormalities were scanned at 3 T. Images were obtained using GRAPPA-accelerated readout-segmented EPI and GRAPPA-accelerated EPI with an identical scanning time, acceleration factor, target resolution, and image postprocessing procedure. The two datasets were independently reviewed by two blinded neuroradiologists. Imaging studies were evaluated for resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, distortion, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence and graded using a 7-point Likert scale (1, nondiagnostic; 7, outstanding). RESULTS There was good reader agreement in the scores (κ = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.78). The mean scores for EPI and readout-segmented EPI, respectively, were as follows: resolution, 5.0 and 6.0; SNR, 5.5 and 3.0; contrast, 3.7 and 3.2; distortion, 4.8 and 6.0; lesion conspicuity, 4.6 and 5.1; and diagnostic confidence, 4.7 and 5.4. Readout-segmented EPI was superior in resolution, distortion reduction, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence, whereas EPI scored better in SNR and contrast. Readout-segmented EPI was considered the better sequence overall in 85% of the cases. CONCLUSION This study shows the benefits of improved resolution and reduced distortion of readout-segmented EPI in evaluating the orbit, skull base, and posterior fossa, sites of common neuropathologic abnormalities in children.

[1]  Bong Joo Kang,et al.  Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality , 2014, Abdominal Radiology.

[2]  D. Porter,et al.  Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[3]  David A Porter,et al.  Implementation and assessment of diffusion‐weighted partial Fourier readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  A. Gentles,et al.  Clinical Application of Readout-Segmented− Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Pediatric Brain , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  S. Skare,et al.  Robust GRAPPA‐accelerated diffusion‐weighted readout‐segmented (RS)‐EPI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  High resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging using readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two‐dimensional navigator‐based reacquisition , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  S. Skare,et al.  Readout-segmented EPI for rapid high resolution diffusion imaging at 3 T. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Stefan Skare,et al.  Clinical multishot DW‐EPI through parallel imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  S. Skare,et al.  Propeller EPI in the other direction , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Grant,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pediatric clinical applications. , 2006, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[11]  Stephen Price,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of the Brain , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[12]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Jing Yuan,et al.  Tailored utilization of acquired k-space points for GRAPPA reconstruction. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[14]  M. Moseley,et al.  Self‐navigated interleaved spiral (SNAILS): Application to high‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  James G Pipe,et al.  Multishot diffusion‐weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. , 2000, Radiology.

[19]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. Pauly,et al.  Isotropic diffusion‐weighted and spiral‐navigated interleaved EPI for routine imaging of acute stroke , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  R. Turner,et al.  Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Weili Lin,et al.  A fast, iterative, partial-fourier technique capable of local phase recovery , 1991 .