Quadrupolar stimulation for cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data

Cochlear implants are electrically driven in monopolar, bipolar, or common ground mode. Ideally, a quadrupolar mode is created with three colinear electrodes, where the outer poles are half the inverse polarity value of the center electrode. The resulting field is highly focused. Models of point sources show that the quadrupolar paradigm offers a greater choice of parameters to shape the field. Simulation with a lumped-parameter model of the cochlea confirms the focusing action of the quadrupole in the layers of the inner ear. Field measurements in saline solution and in the scala tympani of guinea pigs show that focusing occurs with the quadrupolar mode. It is conceivable that quadrupolar stimulation will affect the pitch place coding, reduce channel interaction and limit facial or tactile stimulation induced by current spread.

[1]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[2]  W. Kalender,et al.  Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[3]  F. Spelman,et al.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Inner ear implants for experimental electrical stimulation of auditory nerve arrays , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  P. Montandon,et al.  Intracochlear Potential Distribution with Intracochlear and Extracochlear Electrical Stimulation in Humans , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  L. Mens,et al.  Cochlear Implant Generated Surface Potentials: Current Spread and Side Effects , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[7]  D K Kessler,et al.  Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[8]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[9]  J Rozman,et al.  Multielectrode spiral cuff for ordered and reversed activation of nerve fibres. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[10]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Selective stimulation of sacral nerve roots for bladder control: A study by computer modeling , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  P Jayakar,et al.  Physiological principles of electrical stimulation. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[12]  P. Lorrain,et al.  Electromagnetic fields and waves , 1970 .

[13]  G. Clark,et al.  The Nucleus 22‐Channel Cochlear Implant System , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[14]  G. Girzon,et al.  Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes , 1987 .

[15]  Tohru Ifukube,et al.  Current Distributions Produced Inside and Outside the Cochlea from a Scala Tympani Electrode Array , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Brummer,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: Trace analysis for dissolved platinum and other dissolved electrochemical products. , 1977, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[18]  T Spillmann,et al.  Speech encoding strategies for multielectrode cochlear implants: a digital signal processor approach. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[19]  W. Grill,et al.  Selective control of muscle activation with a multipolar nerve cuff electrode , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Brent Townshend,et al.  Reduction of Electrical Interaction in Auditory Prostheses , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[22]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[23]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.