Throughfall partitioning by trees

Although we know that rainfall interception (the rain caught, stored, and evaporated from aboveground vegetative surfaces and ground litter) is affected by rain and throughfall drop size, what was unknown until now is the relative proportion of each throughfall type (free throughfall, splash throughfall, canopy drip) beneath coniferous and broadleaved trees. Based on a multinational data set of >120 million throughfall drops, we found that the type, number, and volume of throughfall drops are different between coniferous and broadleaved tree species, leaf states, and timing within rain events. Compared with leafed broadleaved trees, conifers had a lower percentage of canopy drip (51% vs. 69% with respect to total throughfall volume) and slightly smaller diameter splash throughfall and canopy drip. Canopy drip from leafless broadleaved trees consisted of fewer and smaller diameter drops (D₅₀_DR, 50th cumulative drop volume percentile for canopy drip, of 2.24 mm) than leafed broadleaved trees (D₅₀_DR of 4.32 mm). Canopy drip was much larger in diameter under woody drip points (D₅₀_DR of 5.92 mm) than leafed broadleaved trees. Based on throughfall volume, the percentage of canopy drip was significantly different between conifers, leafed broadleaved trees, leafless broadleaved trees, and woody surface drip points (p ranged from <0.001 to 0.005). These findings are partly attributable to differences in canopy structure and plant surface characteristics between plant functional types and canopy state (leaf, leafless), among other factors. Hence, our results demonstrating the importance of drop‐size‐dependent partitioning between coniferous and broadleaved tree species could be useful to those requiring more detailed information on throughfall fluxes to the forest floor.

[1]  Shigeki Murakami,et al.  A proposal for a new forest canopy interception mechanism : Splash droplet evaporation , 2006 .

[2]  Kazuki Nanko,et al.  Throughfall under a teak plantation in Thailand: a multifactorial analysis on the effects of canopy phenology and meteorological conditions , 2014, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[3]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Assessment of the Thies optical disdrometer performance , 2011 .

[4]  Ian R. Calder,et al.  A stochastic model of rainfall interception , 1986 .

[5]  D. Levia,et al.  A review of stemflow generation dynamics and stemflow‐environment interactions in forests and shrublands , 2015 .

[6]  A. Moss,et al.  Erosive effects of the large water drops (gravity drops) that fall from plants , 1987 .

[7]  Delphis F. Levia,et al.  Differences in throughfall drop size distributions in the presence and absence of foliage , 2016 .

[8]  K. Nanko,et al.  Effect of canopy thickness and canopy saturation on the amount and kinetic energy of throughfall: An experimental approach , 2008 .

[9]  E. D. Ford,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CANOPY STRUCTURE ON STEMFLOW, THROUGHFALL AND INTERCEPTION LOSS IN A YOUNG SITKA SPRUCE PLANTATION , 1978 .

[10]  David Dunkerley,et al.  Measuring interception loss and canopy storage in dryland vegetation: a brief review and evaluation of available research strategies , 2000 .

[11]  P. Gleick,et al.  Peak water limits to freshwater withdrawal and use , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  W. Konrad,et al.  Leaf Surface Wettability and Implications for Drop Shedding and Evaporation from Forest Canopies , 2012, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[13]  David Dunkerley,et al.  Evaporation of impact water droplets in interception processes: historical precedence of the hypothesis and a brief literature overview. , 2009 .

[14]  T. Tanaka,et al.  Effects of the Canopy Hydrologic Flux on Groundwater , 2011 .

[15]  Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses,et al.  Rainfall Interception Loss by Forest Canopies , 2011 .

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF RAINDROPS WITH SIZE , 1948 .

[17]  A preliminary evaluation of throughfall sampling techniques in a mature coniferous forest , 2014, Journal of Forestry Research.

[18]  M. Durocher Monitoring spatial variability of forest interception , 1990 .

[19]  L. Madden,et al.  Effect of ground cover, rain intensity and strawberry plants on splash of simulated raindrops , 1993 .

[20]  S. Germer Development of near-surface perched water tables during natural and artificial stemflow generation by babassu palms , 2013 .

[21]  D. L. Reichard,et al.  Motion analysis of drop impaction on a strawberry surface , 1991 .

[22]  S. Trudgill,et al.  Hillslope hydrochemistry and stream response on a wooded, permeable bedrock: The role of stemflow , 1985 .

[23]  Ian R. Calder,et al.  Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size: 2. Experimental determination of the wetting functions and two-layer stochastic model parameters for five tropical tree species , 1996 .

[24]  S. Trumbore,et al.  Vegetation impacts soil water content patterns by shaping canopy water fluxes and soil properties , 2017 .

[25]  Kazuki Nanko,et al.  Evaluating the influence of canopy species and meteorological factors on throughfall drop size distribution , 2006 .

[26]  K. Nanko,et al.  Rainfall erosivity–intensity relationships for normal rainfall events and a tropical cyclone on the US southeast coast , 2016 .

[27]  E. Roark,et al.  Impacts of Vegetation and Precipitation on Throughfall Heterogeneity in a Tropical Pre‐Montane Transitional Cloud Forest , 2013 .

[28]  D. Levia,et al.  Temporal variation in end‐member chemistry and its influence on runoff mixing patterns in a forested, Piedmont catchment , 2013 .

[29]  Stanley R. Herwitz,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of canopy tree interception of wind-driven rainfall , 1995 .

[30]  B. Zimmermann,et al.  Requirements for throughfall monitoring: The roles of temporal scale and canopy complexity , 2014 .

[31]  中屋 耕,et al.  Development of raindrop kinetic energy model under canopy for the estimation of soil erosion in forest , 2011 .

[32]  Delphis F. Levia,et al.  Expressing stemflow commensurate with its ecohydrological importance , 2018, Advances in Water Resources.

[33]  T. Scholten,et al.  Impact of tree saplings on the kinetic energy of rainfall—The importance of stand density, species identity and tree architecture in subtropical forests in China , 2012 .

[34]  K. Nanko,et al.  Physical interpretation of the difference in drop size distributions of leaf drips among tree species , 2013 .

[35]  T. Giambelluca,et al.  Erosion Potential under Miconia calvescens Stands on the Island of Hawai‘i , 2015 .

[36]  J. Bathurst,et al.  45 years of non-stationary hydrology over a forest plantation growth cycle, Coalburn catchment, Northern England , 2014 .

[37]  Delphis F. Levia,et al.  Throughfall drop size distributions: a review and prospectus for future research , 2017 .

[38]  S. Herwitz Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation , 1987 .

[39]  W. Swank,et al.  Streamflow Greatly Reduced by Converting Deciduous Hardwood Stands to Pine , 1974, Science.

[40]  Ż. Polkowska,et al.  Spatial variability of throughfall in a stand of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) with deciduous admixture as influenced by canopy cover and stem distance , 2016 .

[41]  Karen Andsager,et al.  Laboratory Measurements of Axis Ratios for Large Raindrops , 1999 .