Health‐Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Therapy in HR+, HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer

Abstract Background MONARCH 3, a phase III trial (NCT02246621) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously demonstrated significantly improved progression‐free survival in patients receiving abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This study evaluated patient‐reported outcomes, including global health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms. Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily; n = 328) or placebo (n = 165), plus 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast Cancer–Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire HRQoL instruments were administered at baseline, every two cycles during cycles 2 through 19 (each cycle being 28 days), every three cycles thereafter, and once at a short‐term posttherapy follow‐up visit (approximately 30 days after discontinuation). Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD), respectively. Results Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. Although select scores statistically favored the placebo arm, global HRQoL, most symptoms, and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm with statistically and clinically meaningful differences. There were no TTSD differences between treatment arms for global HRQoL, most symptoms (except diarrhea), or functioning. Conclusion Over a 2‐year period, there were no clinically meaningful differences in global HRQoL, functioning, and most symptoms for patients receiving abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm, consistent with prior safety data, which has been shown to be manageable and reversible. Combined with clinical efficacy, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC. Implications for Practice The addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) was not associated with a clinically meaningful detriment in patient‐reported global health‐related quality of life, functioning, and most symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Prior studies have also demonstrated clinical efficacy of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone, including improved progression‐free survival and objective response rate. These results also complement previously reported toxicity data, as measured by investigator‐assessed adverse events. Taken together, these results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC.

[1]  P. Neven,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer After Endocrine Therapy. , 2020, The oncologist.

[2]  P. Neven,et al.  The Effect of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant on Overall Survival in Hormone Receptor–Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed on Endocrine Therapy—MONARCH 2 , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[3]  H. Iwata,et al.  MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer , 2019, npj Breast Cancer.

[4]  P. Fayers,et al.  General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[5]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  Deficiencies in health-related quality-of-life assessment and reporting: a systematic review of oncology randomized phase III trials published between 2012 and 2016 , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  L. Fallowfield Quality of life assessment using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: still a Cinderella outcome? , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  N S El Saghir,et al.  4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)† , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  G. Sledge,et al.  The association of early toxicity and outcomes for patients treated with abemaciclib. , 2018 .

[10]  P. Neven,et al.  Impact of palbociclib plus letrozole on patient-reported health-related quality of life: results from the PALOMA-2 trial , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  M. Goetz,et al.  MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  P. Neven,et al.  MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  C. Hudis,et al.  MONARCH 1, A Phase II Study of Abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitor, as a Single Agent, in Patients with Refractory HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  A. Tutt,et al.  3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3) , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  R. Hofheinz,et al.  Patient preferences for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[16]  Tuan S. Nguyen,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib, an Inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for Patients with Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Other Solid Tumors. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[17]  W. Gradishar,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Updates: Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[18]  S. Loi,et al.  Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  R. Gralla,et al.  Determining issues of importance for the evaluation of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer: results of a survey of 1072 patients , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[20]  P. Iversen,et al.  Preclinical characterization of the CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219: in-vivo cell cycle-dependent/independent anti-tumor activities alone/in combination with gemcitabine , 2014, Investigational New Drugs.

[21]  Kathleen A Cronin,et al.  US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  P. Auquier,et al.  Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization? , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  Tiffany Shao,et al.  The price we pay for progress: a meta-analysis of harms of newly approved anticancer drugs. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  P. Dobkin,et al.  Fear of Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer or in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain , 2011, The Clinical journal of pain.

[25]  T. Reimer,et al.  Recurrent breast cancer: treatment strategies for maintaining and prolonging good quality of life. , 2010, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[26]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  W. Gradishar,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Update: Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[29]  A. Tutt,et al.  3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  D. Osoba,et al.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.