论文信息 - Simulation, Gaming, and the Simulative

Simulation, Gaming, and the Simulative

This article examines the dominance of media-effects studies in communications scholarship and compares the study of communications with the study of simulations and games. The author draws parallels between the two fields of study and discusses the future research agenda for the study of simulations and games.

David Myers

[1] Sharon Pray Muir. Simulations for Elementary and Primary School Social Studies: An Annotated Bibliography , 1996 .

[2] M. Spariosu,et al. Dionysus Reborn: Play and the Aesthetic Dimension in Modern Philosophical and Scientific Discourse , 1989 .

[3] Paul,et al. Balance of Power , 2001 .

[4] James R. Beniger,et al. Who Are the Most Important Theorists of Communication? , 1990 .

[5] Hernando González. The Evolution of Communication as a Field , 1988 .

[6] J. Moran-Ellis. The ambiguity of play , 1998 .

[7] J. Beniger. Information and Communication , 1988 .

[8] Michel Dupagne,et al. Reply to Sparks's Critique , 1995 .

[9] W. James Potter. The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research. , 1991 .

[10] David Myers,et al. Simulation as Play: A Semiotic Analysis , 1999 .

[11] Jean Baudrillard,et al. Symbolic Exchange And Death , 1993 .

[12] H. Maturana,et al. Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[13] Michel Dupagne,et al. The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals , 1993 .

[14] David Crookall,et al. Developing a Scientific Knowledge of Simulation/Gaming , 1998 .

[15] Don Handelman. Models and Mirrors: Towards an Anthropology of Public Events , 1990 .