THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF‐ AND FOLLOWER RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP

The impact of upward feedback (followers' perceptions of leadership provided to leaders) on leaders' self-evaluations and followers' subsequent ratings of leadership was assessed in a field setting. Subjects were 978 student leaders and their 1,232 followers. Results indicated that overall, leaders' behaviors as rated by followers improved after feedback. Leaders' self-evaluations following feedback became more similar to the evaluations provided by followers. Interestingly, when leaders were grouped according to whether feedback was positive, neutral, or negative based on agreement between self- and follower ratings, differences between groups in post-feedback self-evaluations and follower ratings emerged. Self-evaluations for leaders receiving negative feedback (high self- relative to followers' ratings) went down, while self-evaluations for leaders receiving positive feedback (low self- relative to follower's ratings) went up. Follower ratings of leaders who received negative feedback improved following feedback to leaders, while there was no change in follower ratings for those receiving positive feedback. Implications for using upward feedback in organizations are discussed.

[1]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of source. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  W. Harvey Hegarty,et al.  Using subordinate ratings to elicit behavioral changes in supervisors. , 1974 .

[3]  H. Kaufman.  Individual differences, early work challenge, and participation in continuing education. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Robert L. Holzbach,et al.  Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings. , 1978 .

[5]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. , 1979 .

[6]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[7]  George C. Thornton,et al.  PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-APPRAISALS OF JOB PERFORMANCE , 1980 .

[8]  D. Ilgen,et al.  Performance Attributional Effects on Feedback from Superiors , 1980 .

[9]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review. , 1981 .

[10]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[11]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[12]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[13]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. , 1984 .

[14]  Dianna L. Stone,et al.  The Effects of Multiple Sources of Performance Feedback and Feedback Favorability on Self-Perceived Task Competence and Perceived Feedback Accuracy , 1984 .

[15]  J. Werbel,et al.  Effects of Purpose of the Appraisal and Expectation of Validation On Self-Appraisal Leniency , 1986 .

[16]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[17]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Supervisors' performance feedback to subordinates: The impact of subordinate performance valence and outcome dependence☆ , 1986 .

[18]  J. Ford,et al.  Changes in self-perceived ability as a function of performance in an assessment centre , 1986 .

[19]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[20]  Shaul Fox,et al.  VALIDITY OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT: A FIELD EVALUATION , 1988 .

[21]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  A FIELD STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATIONAL FEEDBACK ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE , 1989 .

[22]  Jiing-Lih Farh,et al.  Effects of comparative performance information on the accuracy of self-ratings and agreement between self- and supervisor ratings. , 1989 .

[23]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Congruence of Self and Others' Leadership Ratings of Naval Officers for Understanding Successful Performance , 1991 .

[24]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  DOES SELF‐OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS? , 1992 .

[25]  L. Atwater,et al.  Understanding self‐perception accuracy: Implications for human resource management , 1993 .

[26]  Richard W. Beatty,et al.  360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage , 1993 .

[27]  Walter W. Tornow,et al.  Perceptions or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? , 1993 .

[28]  H. J. Bernardin,et al.  Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals , 1993 .