Maximizing available spectrum for cognitive radios

Cognitive radios have been proposed to address the dual problem of spectrum under-utilization and the need for vast swathes of new spectrum in the 0-3GHz band for wireless data services. Previous research in the area of cognitive radios has concentrated on signal processing (SP) innovations for improved detection with a limited number of samples (a.k.a detection sensitivity). However the SP perspective alone is unable to recover much unused spectrum. In this thesis we focus on two fronts to maximize the recovery of unused spectrum. First, we take a spatial perspective on spectrum usage. Second, we will look at advanced algorithms which use other radios and frequencies to aid the detection process.The spatial perspective is necessitated by the FCC's decision to open up TV bands for lwhite spacer/opportunistic spectrum use. Examination of the FCC's choice of parameters reveals the political and engineering tradeoffs made by the FCC. The FCC's rules applied to the database of TV transmitters and the population density of the United States as per the census of 2000 reveal that the geo-location rules enable an average of 9 white space channels per person. This number does not change significantly even if the secondaries take a purely selfish approach and operate only where the pollution from TV transmitters is low. The corresponding political tradeoff sacrifices 1 people-channel for broadcast use to gain 8 people-channels for white space use. Spectrum sensing is another mechanism to recover the available opportunity. Here, the FCC's sensing rule of -114dBm is very conservative and yields only a average of 1 white space channel per person. This spatial analysis points to the inability of traditional detection metrics in predicting the spatial performance of sensing. To overcome this problem, we propose the twin metrics of Fear of Harmful Interference (FHI) and Weighted Probability of Area Recovered (WPAR) to quantify the performance of sensing relative to geo-location. Fear of Harmful interference (FHI), captures the safety to the primary users and is largely the fading-aware probability of missed detection with modifications to allow easier incorporation of system-level uncertainty. Weighted Probability of Area Recovered (WPAR), captures the performance of spectrum sensing by appropriately weighting the probability of false alarm (PFA) across different spatial locations. These metrics give a unifying framework in which to compare different spectrum-sensing algorithms. Reasonable parameters for this metric (most crucially, something which can be interpreted as a spatial discount factor) are obtained from the TV database and US population data. Cooperative Sensing, in which secondaries use sensing results from multiple nearby radios to decide on whether the band is free to use, has been proposed as a mechanism to improve the performance over a single radio. However, the motivation for using cooperative sensing is different for recovering a temporal as opposed to recovering a spatial hole. For a temporal hole, cooperative sensing is used to gather as much energy in the primary signal as possible, thus maximizing the gap between the means of the signal present and signal absent hypotheses. For a spatial hole there is a mapping between the nominal signal strength at a given distance from the transmitter and the distance itself. By cooperating the hope is to converge to this nominal signal level. This difference has major implications on the choice of cooperation rule for different scenarios. A median rule is proposed as a robust cooperation rule for spatial holes. This rule can be implemented as a hard combining rule and is robust to uncertainties in the fading models and untrusted radio behavior. Unfortunately all cooperation suffers when there is a loss in spatial diversity. To combat shadowing correlation across space, assisted/calibrated detection in the form of multiband sensing is proposed. In multiband sensing, detection results from nearby frequencies is used to aid detection in the frequency band of interest. Cooperation across multiband radios is robust against channel correlation and provides gains by weeding out radios afflicted by adverse propagation environments. A mobile, wideband testbed was designed and used to capture TV signals in the 500-700MHz band at various locations in Berkeley, CA. Analysis of these measurements reveals high shadowing and multipath spread correlation across frequencies. These new insights into the spectral environment are used to design detectors that perform better than a single band detector. The ability to coexist with primaries of different scales (high power TV transmitters and low power Wireless Microphones) is an important requirement for a cognitive radio system. When sensing a large scale primary, a small scale secondary user can make its own decision about transmission based on the sensing results from its neighborhood. This assumption fails when the scale of the primary is comparable to the scale of the secondary user. In this scenario, we need to decouple sensing from admission control -- a sensor network is required to perform the sensing and localize the primary. For small primaries, the environment over which the sensing results are valid is small which imposes certain minimum density requirements for sensor nodes. Location information of the primary and secondary users is key for such an admission control algorithm to operate successfully.

[1]  Paul J. Kolodzy,et al.  Interference temperature: a metric for dynamic spectrum utilization , 2006, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[2]  Anant Sahai,et al.  SNR Walls for Signal Detection , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[3]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  Defense against Primary User Emulation Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Robert W. Brodersen,et al.  Addressing the Dynamic Range Problem in Cognitive Radios , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[5]  Ainslie,et al.  CORRELATION MODEL FOR SHADOW FADING IN MOBILE RADIO SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[6]  Rahul Tandra,et al.  Fundamental limits on detection in low SNR , 2005 .

[7]  S.M. Mishra,et al.  Coexistence with Primary Users of Different Scales , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[8]  Danijela Cabric,et al.  Experimental study of spectrum sensing based on energy detection and network cooperation , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[9]  M. McHenry,et al.  The probe spectrum access method , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[10]  Rahul Tandra,et al.  Spectrum Sharing by Cognitive Radios: Opportunities and Challenges , 2009 .

[11]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Is interference like noise when you know its codebook? , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[12]  Ranjan K. Mallik,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Optimization in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[13]  Ning Han,et al.  Weighted-Collaborative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio , 2007, 2007 Second International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[14]  Kaigui Bian,et al.  Robust Distributed Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[15]  George Atia,et al.  Robust Energy Efficient Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radios , 2007, 2007 IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[16]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio, Part I: Two User Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[17]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[18]  J. Riley,et al.  The analytics of uncertainty and information: Long-run relationships and the credibility of threats and promises , 1992 .

[19]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Cognitive Technology for improving Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Coexistence , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband.

[20]  C. Cordeiro,et al.  IEEE 802.22: the first worldwide wireless standard based on cognitive radios , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[21]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[22]  A. Sahai,et al.  Crime and Punishment for Cognitive Radios , 2008, 2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.

[23]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  How Dense Should a Sensor Network Be for Detection With Correlated Observations? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[24]  Przemyslaw Pawelczak,et al.  Multinode Spectrum Sensing Based on Energy Detection for Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[25]  A. Sahai,et al.  How much white space is there ? , 2009 .

[26]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[27]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Covariance Based Signal Detections for Cognitive Radio , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[28]  Zhiqiang Li,et al.  Distributed Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[29]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative Sensing among Cognitive Radios , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[30]  E. Visotsky,et al.  On collaborative detection of TV transmissions in support of dynamic spectrum sharing , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[31]  Danijela Cabric,et al.  White paper: Corvus: A cognitive radio approach for usage of virtual unlicensed spectrum , 2004 .

[32]  John H. Niedercorn A NEGATIVE EXPONENTIAL MODEL OF URBAN LAND USE DENSITIES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT: A REPLY , 1971 .

[33]  Stephen J. Shellhammer,et al.  Performance of power detector sensors of DTV signals in IEEE 802.22 WRANs , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[34]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Achievable rates in cognitive radio channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[35]  G. Hufford A characterization of the multipath in the HDTV channel , 1992 .

[36]  Herbert A. David,et al.  Order Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[37]  A. Sahai,et al.  On the Need for Knowledge of the Phase in Exploiting Known Primary Transmissions , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[38]  R. López-Valcarce,et al.  Wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive radio: Joint estimation of noise variance and multiple signal levels , 2009, 2009 IEEE 10th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[39]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio , 2000 .

[40]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Spatiotemporal Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[41]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[42]  Xianming Qing,et al.  Spectrum Survey in Singapore: Occupancy Measurements and Analyses , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom 2008).

[43]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  GUESS: gossiping updates for efficient spectrum sensing , 2006, MobiShare '06.

[44]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Sliding-Window Algorithm for Asynchronous Cooperative Sensing in Wireless Cognitive Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[45]  J. H. Snider America’s $480 Billion Spectrum Giveaway, How It Happened, and How to Prevent It from Recurring , 2007 .

[46]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Cooperative Sensing for Primary Detection in Cognitive Radio , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[48]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Optimal Multiband Joint Detection for Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[49]  Majid Khabbazian,et al.  Secure Cooperative Sensing Techniques for Cognitive Radio Systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[50]  Pramod Viswanath,et al.  Cognitive Radio: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[51]  Anant Sahai,et al.  What is a Spectrum Hole and What Does it Take to Recognize One? , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[52]  Anant Sahai,et al.  The case for multiband sensing , 2007 .

[53]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Soft Combination and Detection for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[54]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Fundamental design tradeoffs in cognitive radio systems , 2006, TAPAS '06.

[55]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio, Part II: Multiuser Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[56]  T. A. Weiss,et al.  A diversity approach for the detection of idle spectral resources in spectrum pooling systems , 2003 .

[57]  Kate Harrison,et al.  How Much White-Space Capacity Is There? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).