Survival of women ages 40‐49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection

The value of mammographic screening in reducing breast carcinoma mortality among women younger than 50 years continues to be controversial. Previous randomized clinical trials have not been definitive because of inadequate sample sizes, prolonged screening intervals, questionable randomization, and/or cross‐contamination between intervention groups. This study uses a historical prospective cohort design to examine differences in prognostic factors at the time of breast carcinoma diagnosis and differences in overall survival among patients ages 40‐49 years, according to the method of breast carcinoma detection.

[1]  S Shapiro,et al.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  L. Tabár,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.

[3]  E. Halpern,et al.  Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among Women 40‐49 years of age with particular emphasis on the national breast screening study of Canada , 1994, Cancer.

[4]  L. Tabár,et al.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  C. J. Rosenquist,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[6]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  D. Kopans Conventional wisdom: observation, experience, anecdote, and science in breast imaging. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Breast cancer: age-specific growth rates and screening strategies. , 1986, Radiology.

[9]  C. Smart,et al.  Breast cancer detection guidelines for women aged 40 to 49 years: Rationale for the american cancer society reaffirmation of recommendations , 1994, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[11]  Histopathologic and cytochemical characteristics of interval breast carcinomas from the Stockholm Mammography Screening Project. , 1992, Acta oncologica.

[12]  R. Tarone,et al.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  N Volkers NCI replaces guidelines with statement of evidence. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[15]  S. Rubin,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. , 1995, JAMA.

[16]  R. Tarone The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study , 1995, Cancer.

[17]  S. Feig Determination of mammographic screening intervals with surrogate measures for women aged 40-49 years. , 1994, Radiology.

[18]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[19]  László Tabár,et al.  Quantitative Interpretation of Age-Specific Mortality Reductions From the Swedish Breast Cancer-Screening Trials , 1995 .

[20]  D. Kopans,et al.  Breast cancer survival among women under age 50: is mammography detrimental? , 1992, The Lancet.

[21]  S. Feig,et al.  Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammographic screening of women aged 40‐49 years , 1995, Cancer.

[22]  L. Tabár,et al.  REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.

[23]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Effects of lead time, length bias, and false‐negative assurance on screening for breast cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[24]  S. Feig Mammography screening: published guidelines and actual practice. , 1987, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[25]  G. Dodd,et al.  The American Cancer Society guidelines for the cancer‐related checkup: An update , 1991, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  T. Landberg,et al.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. , 1988, BMJ.

[27]  B. Muir,et al.  The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.