Going with the flow: An activity theory analysis of flow techniques in software development
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Nardi. Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .
[2] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..
[3] Ken Power. Definition of Ready: An Experience Report from Teams at Cisco , 2014, XP.
[4] Claes Wohlin,et al. Experimentation in Software Engineering , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[5] Jørn Ola Birkeland. From a Timebox Tangle to a More Flexible Flow , 2010, XP.
[6] Pekka Abrahamsson,et al. On the Impact of Kanban on Software Project Work: An Empirical Case Study Investigation , 2011, 2011 16th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems.
[7] Danny Berry,et al. Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain , 1999 .
[8] M. Packer,et al. Sociocultural and Constructivist Theories of Learning: Ontology, Not Just Epistemology , 2000 .
[9] M. Cole. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .
[10] Joseph G. Davis,et al. Activity theory as a theoretical foundation for information systems research , 2000, IRMA Conference.
[11] Kieran Conboy,et al. Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..
[12] Mary Poppendieck,et al. The Lean Mindset: Ask the Right Questions , 2013 .
[13] Claes Wohlin,et al. Measuring the flow in lean software development , 2011, Softw. Pract. Exp..
[14] Oisín Cawley,et al. "Leagile" software development: An experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development , 2012, J. Syst. Softw..
[15] Michele Marchesi,et al. Studying Lean-Kanban Approach Using Software Process Simulation , 2011, XP.
[16] Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al. Challenges to Teamwork: A Multiple Case Study of Two Agile Teams , 2011, XP.
[17] M. Christopher,et al. The Supply Chain Strategy Conundrum: To be Lean Or Agile or To be Lean And Agile? , 2002 .
[18] Ryan Polk. Agile and Kanban in Coordination , 2011, 2011 AGILE Conference.
[19] Y. Engeström,et al. Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice , 1993 .
[20] Klaas-Jan Stol,et al. Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda , 2017, J. Syst. Softw..
[21] Michele Marchesi,et al. Simulating Kanban and Scrum vs. Waterfall with System Dynamics , 2011, XP.
[22] Al Sarraj,et al. Formal Development of Line‐of‐Balance Technique , 1990 .
[23] Brian Fitzgerald,et al. Continuous software engineering and beyond: trends and challenges , 2014, RCoSE 2014.
[24] Onur Behzat Tokdemir,et al. CHALLENGES IN LINE-OF-BALANCE SCHEDULING , 2002 .
[25] Miroslaw Staron,et al. Monitoring Bottlenecks in Agile and Lean Software Development Projects - A Method and Its Industrial Use , 2011, PROFES.
[26] Kai Petersen,et al. Waste and Lead Time Reduction in a Software Product Customization Process with Value Stream Maps , 2010, 2010 21st Australian Software Engineering Conference.
[27] B MilesMatthew,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.
[28] Susanne Bødker,et al. Introduction: Information Technology in Human Activity , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[29] Kieran Conboy,et al. A Metric-Based Approach to Managing Architecture-Related Impediments in Product Development Flow: An Industry Case Study from Cisco , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Software Architecture and Metrics.
[30] Helen Hasan,et al. Blending Complexity and Activity Frameworks for a Broader and Deeper Understanding of IS , 2010, ICIS.
[31] Isaac Pentinmaki,et al. Review of "Lean software development: an agile tookit" by Mary and Tom Poppendieck. Addison Wesley 2003. , 2004, SOEN.
[32] Onur Behzat Tokdemir,et al. Effect of learning on line-of-balance scheduling , 2001 .
[33] T. Schatzki. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social , 1996 .
[34] Gareth Evans,et al. Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Agile Usage - Insights from the BBC Worldwide Case Study , 2011, XP.
[35] A. N. Oppenheim,et al. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement , 1992 .
[36] Paul Shannon,et al. From Chaos to Kanban, via Scrum , 2010, XP.
[37] Per Runeson,et al. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.
[38] Hakan Erdogmus. Tracking Progress through Earned Value , 2010, IEEE Softw..
[39] Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al. Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[40] Mary Poppendieck,et al. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit , 2003 .
[41] Robert L. Nord,et al. Making Architecture Visible to Improve Flow Management in Lean Software Development , 2012, IEEE Software.
[42] Dag I. K. Sjøberg,et al. Quantifying the Effect of Using Kanban versus Scrum: A Case Study , 2012, IEEE Software.
[43] Charles Puryear Nelson,et al. Contradictions in learning to write in a second language classroom: insights from radical constructivism, activity theory, and complexity theory , 2002 .
[44] Pekka Abrahamsson,et al. Lean Software Development , 2012, IEEE Softw..
[45] Marc J. Dupuis,et al. A grounded theory analysis of modern web applications: knowledge, skills, and abilities for DevOps , 2013, RIIT '13.
[46] K. Foot. Cultural‐historical activity theory as practice theory: illuminating the development of conflict‐monitoring network , 2001 .
[47] H. Rubin,et al. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , 1995 .
[48] Michael J. Gallivan,et al. Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.
[49] Christopher M. Shinkle. Applying the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition to the Adoption of Kanban Systems at Software Engineering Professionals (SEP) , 2009, 2009 Agile Conference.
[50] Elizabeth Murphy,et al. Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation Activity Theory perspective , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[51] Stan Karanasios,et al. HOW SHOULD TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE BE EXPLAINED ? A COMPARISON OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF CRITICAL REALISM AND ACTIVITY THEORY 1 , 2013 .
[52] Pekka Abrahamsson,et al. Exploring the Sources of Waste in Kanban Software Development Projects , 2010, 2010 36th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.
[53] Merja Helle,et al. Disturbances and Contradictions as Tools for Understanding Work in the Newsroom , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[54] D. Reinertsen. The Principles of Product Development Flow: Second Generation Lean Product Development , 2009 .
[55] Mikko Korpela,et al. Information Systems Development as an Activity , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[56] James P. Womack,et al. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .
[57] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Information system development agility as organizational learning , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[58] Katharina Burger,et al. Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[59] Michael A. Cusumano,et al. Lean Software Development: A Tutorial , 2012, IEEE Software.
[60] Fumihiko Kinoshita. Practices of an Agile Team , 2008, Agile 2008 Conference.
[61] Robert K. Yin,et al. Applications of case study research , 1993 .
[62] Jan Bosch,et al. 2nd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE 2015) , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering.
[63] Muhammad Ovais Ahmad,et al. Kanban in software development: A systematic literature review , 2013, 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.
[64] Heather E. Canary,et al. The Mediation of Policy Knowledge: An Interpretive Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems , 2009 .
[65] Tony Gorschek,et al. Extending value stream mapping through waste definition beyond customer perspective , 2014, J. Softw. Evol. Process..
[66] Henrik Kniberg,et al. Kanban and Scrum - Making the Most of Both , 2010 .
[67] Mark A. Spasser. Realist Activity Theory for Digital Library Evaluation: Conceptual Framework and Case Study , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[68] Tom Wengraf. Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods , 2001 .
[69] Claes Wohlin,et al. Context in industrial software engineering research , 2009, 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.
[70] Matthew B. Miles,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .
[71] Stan Karanasios,et al. Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[72] Allen S. Lee. Editor's comments: research in information systems: what we haven't learned , 2001 .
[73] Rui Chen,et al. Data Model Development for Fire Related Extreme Events: An Activity Theory Approach , 2013, MIS Q..
[74] Stan Karanasios,et al. Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[75] Mikko Korpela,et al. Activity Theory in information systems research and practice - theoretical underpinnings for an information systems development method , 2007, Inf. Res..
[76] Mira Kajko-Mattsson,et al. Developer-driven big-bang process transition from Scrum to Kanban , 2011, ICSSP '11.
[77] Marko Ikonen. Leadership in Kanban Software Development Projects: A Quasi-controlled Experiment , 2010, LESS.
[78] Jan Bosch,et al. Climbing the "Stairway to Heaven": Evolving From Agile Development to Continuous Deployment of Software , 2014, Continuous Software Engineering.
[79] Per Runeson,et al. Early identification of bottlenecks in very large scale system of systems software development , 2014, J. Softw. Evol. Process..
[80] Siobhan O'Donovan,et al. Reimagining Gamification through the Lens of Activity Theory , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
[81] K. Kuutti. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .
[82] Taiichi Ohno,et al. Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .
[83] V. Kaptelinin. Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .