Sustainable supply chain management: continuing evolution and future directions

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to update the work of Carter and Easton (2011), by conducting a systematic review of the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature in the primary logistics and supply chain management journals, during the 2010–2018 timeframe. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology which follows the methodology employed by Carter and Easton (2011). An evaluation of this methodology, using the Modified AMSTAR criteria, demonstrates a high level of empirical validity. Findings The field of SSCM continues to evolve with changes in substantive focus, theoretical lenses, unit of analysis, methodology and type of analysis. However, there are still abundant future research opportunities, including investigating under-researched topics such as diversity and human rights/working conditions, employing the group as the unit of analysis and better addressing empirical validity and social desirability bias. Research limitations/implications The findings result in prescriptions and a broad agenda to guide future research in the SSCM arena. The final section of the paper provides additional avenues for future research surrounding theory development and decision making. Originality/value This SLR provides a rigorous, methodologically valid review of the continuing evolution of empirical SSCM research over a 28-year time period.

[1]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[2]  C. Busse.  Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[3]  Lydia Bals,et al.  Procurement sustainability tensions: an integrative perspective , 2018 .

[4]  Saurabh Arora,et al.  Cultures of Caste and Rural Development in the Social Network of a South Indian Village , 2015 .

[5]  Robert A. Bottenberg,et al.  Grouping Criteria-A Method Which Retains Maximum Predictive Efficiency , 1968 .

[6]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[7]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[8]  Tom E. Yoon,et al.  A DECADE OF SCM LITERATURE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS , 2008 .

[9]  Thomas J. Goldsby,et al.  Methods to Our Madness: Adapting Methods to the Changing Nature of Our Problems , 2018, Journal of Business Logistics.

[10]  Jeffrey R. Wilson,et al.  Making Environmental SCM Initiatives Work—Moving Beyond the Dyad to Gain Affective Commitment , 2016 .

[11]  Matthew Semadeni,et al.  The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: : Understanding through simulations , 2014 .

[12]  Thomas F. Gattiker,et al.  Understanding project champions’ ability to gain intra-organizational commitment for environmental projects , 2010 .

[13]  A. Brief.  Editor's Comments: AMR—The Often Misunderstood Journal , 2003 .

[14]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[15]  Wendy L. Tate,et al.  THE USE OF SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 2007 .

[16]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[17]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[18]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  A call for theory: The maturation of the supply chain management discipline , 2011 .

[19]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[20]  D. Power,et al.  Building Bridges : Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[21]  Andy Neely,et al.  Introduction to Special Issue: Innovation and Productivity Performance in the UK , 2004 .

[22]  J. Hoyle,et al.  PROBLEM-ATTACK BEHAVIOR AND SEX, PRIOR TEACHING EXPERIENCE, AND COLLEGE PREPARATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS , 1967 .

[23]  M. Bastl,et al.  Relationship Determinants of Performance in Service Triads: A Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[24]  Timothy D. Ritchie,et al.  The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16) , 2015 .

[25]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  The Impact of Supplier Sustainability Risk on Shareholder Value , 2018, Journal of Supply Chain Management.

[26]  M. Frese.  Grand theories and mid-range theories: cultural effects on theorizing and the attempt to understand active approaches to work , 2005 .

[27]  Kai Foerstl,et al.  The Supply Chain Position Paradox: Green Practices and Firm Performance , 2017 .

[28]  R. Coff,et al.  Both Market and Hierarchy: An Incentive-System Theory of Hybrid Governance Forms , 2009 .

[29]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[30]  C. Carter,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions , 2011 .

[31]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[32]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[33]  John P. Saldanha,et al.  A New Look at the Longitudinal Relationship Between Motor Carrier Financial Performance and Safety , 2016 .

[34]  Virginia S. Y. Kwan,et al.  Making tough choices: A policy capturing approach to evaluating the tradeoffs in sustainable supplier development initiatives , 2019 .

[35]  John A. Aloysius,et al.  Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting , 2017 .

[36]  David E. Cantor,et al.  Workplace safety in the supply chain: a review of the literature and call for research , 2008 .

[37]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of Reviews , 2018, Journal of Business Logistics.

[38]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[39]  C. Carter,et al.  Paradigms, revolutions, and tipping points: The need for using multiple methodologies within the field of supply chain management , 2008 .

[40]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management , 2008 .

[41]  Zaili Yang,et al.  UK supply chain carbon mitigation strategies using alternative ports and multimodal freight transport operations , 2015 .