Information quality and banking success: a theoretical model with empirical validation

Technology plays a key role in today’s business environment and is becoming increasingly necessary for all businesses to incorporate information technology solutions to operate successfully. The importance of information quality in the present business scenario has been drawing the attention of practitioners and academicians. This paper aims at broadening the understanding about information quality as a critical factor by which information technology spread its influences on banking success. In the context of Indian banking, this study examines how banking technology has benefited through information quality. A research framework and associated hypotheses are proposed based on process-based IS success model and instruments are developed to measure and validate information quality and banking success in IT investments. An empirical survey was conducted, and questionnaires were distributed to 600 bankers. A total of 499 valid observations was collected and analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM). The results suggest that information quality has a positive and significant effect on banking success from an internal user perspective.

[1]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  Measuring information output: A communication systems approach , 1978, Inf. Manag..

[2]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Keys to Executive Information Systems Success , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Knowing-Why About Data Processes and Data Quality , 2004 .

[4]  Mouzhi Ge,et al.  Information Quality Assessment and Effects on Inventory Decision-Making , 2009 .

[5]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement , 2009, CSUR.

[6]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[7]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Sasa Baskarada Information Quality Management Capability Maturity Model , 2009 .

[9]  Hamidah Ibrahim,et al.  Data quality: A survey of data quality dimensions , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management.

[10]  L. Hayduk Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[11]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  A product perspective on total data quality management , 1998, CACM.

[12]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[14]  Randy V. Bradley,et al.  Information Systems Success in the Context of Different Corporate Cultural Types: An Empirical Investigation , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Thomas Redman,et al.  The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise , 1998, CACM.

[16]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[17]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Fabio Stella,et al.  Dependency Discovery in Data Quality , 2010, CAiSE.

[20]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[21]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  B. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[23]  Peter Weill,et al.  An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[25]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[26]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Implications of data quality for spreadsheet analysis , 1987, DATB.

[27]  Andy Koronios,et al.  Developing a data quality framework for asset management in engineering organisations , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Qual..

[28]  John Mingers,et al.  Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science , 2006 .

[29]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  Building a Knowledge Base for MIS Research: A Meta-Analysis of a Systems Success Model , 2000, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[30]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Measuring Gains in Operational Efficiency from Information Technology: A Study of the Positran Deployment at Hardee'S Inc. , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  The effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and behavioral intentions: the case of computer purchase , 2001 .

[33]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[34]  Paul Herbig,et al.  An examination of the cross‐cultural differences in service quality: the example of Mexico and the USA , 1996 .

[35]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[37]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  Managing Information Strategically , 1993 .

[38]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Impact of design methods on decision support systems success: An empirical assessment , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[39]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Maintaining IS quality , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[40]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  A Factor and Structural Equation analysis of the Enterprise Systems Success Measurement Model , 2004, AMCIS.

[41]  Martha E. Crosby,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User Modeling Systems , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[42]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[45]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  Collective Risk Management in a Flight to Quality Episode , 2007 .

[46]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Tom Davenport,et al.  Information management infrastructure: the new competitive weapon? , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.