Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication

Author self-citation has long been of interest to those working in informetrics for what it reveals about the publishing behavior of individuals and their relationships within academic networks. While this research has produced interesting insights, it typically assumes either that self-citation is a neutral form of reporting not unlike references to others' work or an unsavory kind of academic egotism. By examining self-citation in a wider context of self-mention, however, the phenomenon can be seen as part of a more comprehensive rhetorical strategy for emphasizing a writer's personal contribution to a piece of research and strengthening his or her knowledge claims, research credibility, and wider standing in the discipline. These meanings are not easily revealed through quantitative bibliometric methods and require careful text analyses and discourse-based interviews with academics. In this paper I explore the use of self-citation and authorial mention in a corpus of 240 research articles and 800 abstracts in eight disciplines. Through an analysis of these texts and interviews with expert informants I show how self-mention is used and the ways these uses reflect both the promotional strategies of individuals and the epistemological practices of their disciplines.

[1]  Erwin Chargaff,et al.  Building the Tower of Babble , 1974, Nature.

[2]  Renata Tagliacozzo,et al.  SELF‐CITATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE , 1977 .

[3]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  The inside-outside looking of the field of bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references , 2001 .

[4]  Mark Abrahamson,et al.  The Scientific Community. , 1966 .

[5]  Pit Pichappan,et al.  The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations , 2002, Scientometrics.

[6]  R. Wodak.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2003 .

[7]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[8]  S. Michael Halloran,et al.  The Birth of Molecular Biology: An Essay in the Rhetorical Criticism of Scientific Discourse. , 1984 .

[9]  FRANKLIN H. PORTUGAL,et al.  On the origins of molecular biology , 1974, Nature.

[10]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[11]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[12]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[13]  F. Crick.  What Mad Pursuit , 1988 .

[14]  Stephen M. Lawani,et al.  On the Heterogeneity and Classification of Author Self-Citations , 2007, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[15]  John O. Corliss.  Council of Biology Editors Style Manual , 1979 .

[16]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[17]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. , 1999 .

[18]  Susan Bonzi,et al.  Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others , 1991, Scientometrics.

[19]  D. Fisher.  The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology , 1979 .

[20]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place , 2002, Scientometrics.

[21]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[22]  G. Macloskie.  MACLOSKIE'S ELEMENTARY BOTANY. , 1883, Science.

[23]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[24]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as citers over time , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..