Wound healing trajectories as predictors of effectiveness of therapeutic agents.

BACKGROUND One goal of wound healing research is to discover agents to accelerate healing. Regulatory agencies have suggested stringent criteria to determine efficacy, that of 100% wound closure. Data analysis at a single point such as 100% closure does not provide detailed information about agent effectiveness over the entire span of healing. HYPOTHESIS Wound healing trajectories can provide such information and can be used to demonstrate utility as alternative end points for wound healing trials. DESIGN Data from 160 patients in 11 clinical trials of diabetic foot ulcers conducted at 2 centers were evaluated. Wound healing trajectories were constructed for patients whose wounds healed (100% closure) and those whose did not (<100% closure) over a 20-week period. The percentage of patients achieving total healing vs time of treatment was plotted and divided into patients receiving a test agent or placebo. RESULTS The healing trajectories were almost identical for patients achieving complete healing at the 2 centers, as were the trajectories for patients with less than 100% closure. However, the trajectories of patients achieving total healing were significantly different from those not achieving 100% closure. Fifty-two percent of all patients achieved 100% healing by 20 weeks; 61% of patients receiving an experimental agent had total healing compared with 39% of placebo-treated patients. Linear regression suggested that all patients would achieve total healing by 37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Since wound healing trajectories for diabetic foot ulcers treated at 2 centers so closely mimic one another, trajectories might be useful efficacy end points, and used to compare significant points along a continuum rather than a single static end point. Shifting of the wound healing trajectory from an impaired to a more ideal course may be considered when determining efficacy of new wound treatments.

[1]  L. Nanney,et al.  Cell biology of wound healing. , 1996, International review of cytology.

[2]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  Initial rate of healing predicts complete healing of venous ulcers. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  D. M. Cooper,et al.  Ease of wound closure as an endpoint of treatment efficacy , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[4]  Bradley C. Wright,et al.  Wound geometry and the kinetics of wound contraction , 1984 .

[5]  C. Winsor,et al.  The Gompertz Curve as a Growth Curve. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. K. Hunt,et al.  The future of recombinant growth factors in wound healing. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[7]  L. Nanney,et al.  Enhancement of wound healing by topical treatment with epidermal growth factor. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  L. Phillips,et al.  Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor-BB for the Treatment of Chronic Pressure Ulcers , 1992, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  L. Broemeling,et al.  In vivo characterization of interleukin‐4 as a potential wound healing agent , 1995, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[10]  J. Snowden,et al.  Wound closure: an analysis of the relative contributions of contraction and epithelialization. , 1984, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  E. LeGrand Preclinical promise of becaplermin (rhPDGF-BB) in wound healing. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[12]  D. Margolis,et al.  Planimetric rate of healing in venous ulcers of the leg treated with pressure bandage and hydrocolloid dressing. , 1993, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  D. M. Cooper,et al.  Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. , 1994, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[14]  W. Chambers,et al.  Regulatory concerns in the development of topical recombinant ophthalmic and cutaneous wound healing biologics , 1994, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[15]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing , 2002 .

[17]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[18]  S. Cohen,et al.  The stimulation of epidermal proliferation by a specific protein (EGF). , 1965, Developmental biology.

[19]  E. Boyko,et al.  Chronology and Determinants of Tissue Repair in Diabetic Lower-Extremity Ulcers , 1991, Diabetes.

[20]  M. Murray,et al.  Topical Growth Factors and Wound Contraction in the Rat: Part I. Literature Review and Definition of the Rat Model , 1989, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[21]  P. L. Noüy,et al.  CICATRIZATION OF WOUNDS , 1916, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  C. Kiritsy,et al.  Role of growth factors in cutaneous wound healing: a review. , 1993, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[23]  D. Kennedy,et al.  A systematic study of wound contraction in mammalian skin. , 1979, Pathology.

[24]  A. Carrel,et al.  CICATRIZATION OF WOUNDS , 1916, The Journal of experimental medicine.