Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China's thermal power industry: A data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach

Appropriate measurement of environmental and emission abatement efficiency is crucial for assisting policy making in line with constructing a more sustainable society. The majority of traditional approaches for environmental efficiency measures take pollutant emissions as either undesirable outputs or environmentally determined inputs which suffer a limitation of not satisfying the physical laws that regulate the operation of economic and environmental process. In this study, we propose a DEA based approach which is combined with the materials balance principle (MBP) that accounts for laws of thermodynamics to jointly evaluate environmental and abatement efficiency. This approach is along the line of weak G-disposability based modelling but is an extension to existing models that in our approach the identification of possible adjustments on polluting mass bound in inputs and outputs, and potential adjustments on abatement of pollutants are all included. The overall environmental efficiency measured by this approach is decomposed into the measures of technical efficiency, polluting inputs allocative efficiency, and polluting and non-polluting inputs allocative efficiency with the emphasizing of incorporating pollutant abatement activities. Accordingly, new measures of abatement efficiency are proposed which help to identify the pollutant abatement potential that can be achieved from end-of-pipe abatement technology promotion associated with polluting input quality promotion and input resources reallocation. Furthermore, several global Malmquist productivity indices for identifying the changes on environmental and abatement efficiency are proposed. This approach is applied to Chinai¯s thermal power industry and some empirical results verifying the necessity of introducing the MBP are obtained.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[4]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[5]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[6]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Joint Production of Good and Bad Outputs with a Network Application , 2013 .

[7]  Sushama Murty,et al.  On modeling pollution-generating technologies , 2012 .

[8]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: A nutrients balance approach , 2011 .

[9]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[10]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China , 2015 .

[11]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Emissions trading and abatement cost savings: An estimation of China's thermal power industry , 2016 .

[13]  Laure Latruffe,et al.  Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Sources of carbon productivity change: A decomposition and disaggregation analysis based on global Luenberger productivity indicator and endogenous directional distance function , 2016 .

[15]  Sabine Himmel Intertemporal Production Frontiers With Dynamic Dea , 2016 .

[16]  D. Rao,et al.  Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach , 2010 .

[17]  Nicola Volta,et al.  Accounting for externalities and disposability: A directional economic environmental distance function , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring Eco-Inefficiency: A New Frontier Approach , 2011, Oper. Res..

[19]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity , 2007 .

[20]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[21]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[22]  L. Liang,et al.  Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model , 2014 .

[23]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: A multi-directional efficiency analysis , 2013 .

[24]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[25]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[26]  Bai-Chen Xie,et al.  Is there a difference between the energy and CO2 emission performance for China’s thermal power industry? A bootstrapped directional distance function approach , 2016 .

[27]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[29]  Benjamin Hampf,et al.  Separating environmental efficiency into production and abatement efficiency: a nonparametric model with application to US power plants , 2014 .

[30]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Sources of energy productivity change in China during 1997–2012: A decomposition analysis based on the Luenberger productivity indicator , 2016 .

[31]  Ke Wang,et al.  Operational performance management of the power industry: a distinguishing analysis between effectiveness and efficiency , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[32]  Dong-hyun Oh,et al.  A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index , 2010 .

[33]  Limin Du,et al.  The effects of electricity reforms on productivity and efficiency of China's fossil-fired power plants: An empirical analysis , 2013 .

[34]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Greg N. Gregoriou,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets , 2008, The Journal of Wealth Management.

[36]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production , 2009 .

[37]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Kenneth Løvold Rødseth Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition reconsidered , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Joint Environmental and Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electricity Generation , 2009 .

[41]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[43]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[44]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[45]  Benjamin Hampf,et al.  Carbon dioxide emission standards for U.S. power plants: An efficiency analysis perspective , 2015 .

[46]  Ke Wang,et al.  A comparative analysis of China’s regional energy and emission performance: Which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs? , 2012 .

[47]  Lili Yang,et al.  Combining global Malmquist–Luenberger index and generalized method of moments to investigate industrial total factor CO2 emission performance: A case of Shanghai (China) , 2015 .

[48]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .