HON Label and DISCERN as Content Quality Indicators of Health-Related Websites

Content quality indicators are warranted in order to help patients and consumers to judge the content quality of health-related on-line information. The aim of the present study is to evaluate web-based information on health topics and to assess particular content quality indicators like HON (Health on the Net) and DISCERN. The present study is based on the analysis of data issued from six previous studies which assessed with a standardized tool the general and content quality (evidence-based health information) of health-related websites. Keywords related to Social phobia, bipolar disorders, pathological gambling as well as cannabis, alcohol and cocaine addiction were entered into popular World Wide Web search engines. Websites were assessed with a standardized proforma designed to rate sites on the basis of accountability, presentation, interactivity, readability and content quality (evidence-based information). “Health on the Net” (HON) quality label, and DISCERN scale scores were used to verify their efficiency as quality indicators. Of 874 websites identified, 388 were included. Despite an observed association with higher content quality scores, the HON label fails to predict good content quality websites when used in a multiple regression. Sensibility and specificity of a DISCERN score >40 in the detection of good content quality websites were, respectively, 0.45 and 0.96. The DISCERN is a potential quality indicator with a relatively high specificity. Further developments in this domain are warranted in order to facilitate the identification of high-quality information on the web by patients.

[1]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[2]  Dan J Stein,et al.  WCA Recommendations for the Long-Term Treatment of Social Phobia , 2003, CNS Spectrums.

[3]  Kristen Shuyler,et al.  What Are Patients Seeking When They Turn to the Internet? Qualitative Content Analysis of Questions Asked by Visitors to an Orthopaedics Web Site , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Don Fallis,et al.  Research Paper: Indicators of Accuracy of Consumer Health Information on the Internet: A Study of Indicators Relating to Information for Managing Fever in Children in the Home , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  V P Abbott,et al.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[6]  C. Silagy,et al.  Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[7]  Y. Khazaal,et al.  Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder. , 2008, Journal of affective disorders.

[8]  John Powell,et al.  The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why? , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Ron D. Appel,et al.  The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites , 1998, MedInfo.

[10]  Y. Khazaal,et al.  Quality of Web-Based Information on Cannabis Addiction , 2008, Journal of drug education.

[11]  J. Powell,et al.  Internet information-seeking in mental health , 2006, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[12]  M. Winker,et al.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. , 2000, JAMA.

[13]  Darren Hargrave,et al.  [Quality of childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in French language]. , 2003, Bulletin du cancer.

[14]  Yasser Khazaal,et al.  Quality of web-based information on alcohol dependence , 2009 .

[15]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  Kathleen M Griffiths,et al.  The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  Y. Khazaal,et al.  Internet Use by Patients with Psychiatric Disorders in Search for General and Medical Informations , 2008, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[20]  eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health related Websites , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  H. Christensen,et al.  Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  M. Perreault,et al.  Determinants of Barriers to Treatment for Anxiety Disorders , 2010, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[23]  Y. Khazaal,et al.  Quality of Web-based Information on Pathological Gambling , 2008, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[24]  C Boyer,et al.  The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites , 1998, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  Gerhard Andersson,et al.  Breast cancer on the Internet: the quality of Swedish breast cancer websites. , 2004, Breast.

[26]  S. Kisely,et al.  A Survey of the Quality of Web Based Information on the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2003, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[27]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Yasser Khazaal,et al.  Quality of web‐based information on social phobia: a cross‐sectional study , 2008, Depression and anxiety.

[29]  Y. Khazaal,et al.  Quality of Web-based information on cocaine addiction. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[30]  Yasser Khazaal,et al.  Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[31]  H. Christensen,et al.  Website Quality Indicators for Consumers , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.