Embodied Semiotic Activities and Their Role in the Construction of Mathematical Meaning of Motion Graphs

This paper examines the relation between bodily actions, artifact-mediated activities, and semiotic processes that students experience while producing and interpreting graphs of two-dimensional motion in the plane. We designed a technology-based setting that enabled students to engage in embodied semiotic activities and experience two modes of interaction: 2D freehand motion and 2D synthesized motion, designed by the composition of single variable function graphs. Our theoretical framework combines two perspectives: the embodied approach to the nature of mathematical thinking and the Vygotskian notion of semiotic mediation. The article describes in detail the actions, gestures, graph drawings, and verbal discourse of one pair of high school students and analyzes the social semiotic processes they experienced. Our analysis shows how the computerized artifacts and the students’ gestures served as means of semiotic mediation. Specifically, they supported the interpretation and the production of motion graphs; they mediated the transition between an individual’s meaning of mathematical signs and culturally accepted mathematical meaning; and they enable linking bodily actions with formal signs.

[1]  Paul Ernest,et al.  A Semiotic Perspective of Mathematical Activity: The Case of Number , 2006 .

[2]  Jere Confrey,et al.  A student's construction of transformations of functions in a multiple representational environment , 1996 .

[3]  C. Laborde,et al.  Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation , 2007 .

[4]  Maria Alessandra Mariotti.  Influence of technologies advances on students' math learning , 2002 .

[5]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Interpreting Motion Graphs through Metaphorical Projection of Embodied Experience , 2006 .

[6]  David Tall,et al.  Using Technology to Support an Embodied Approach to Learning Concepts in Mathematics , 2004 .

[7]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[8]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[9]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[10]  Judah L. Schwartz,et al.  On the Need for a Bridging Language for Mathematical Modeling. , 1995 .

[11]  Heinz Steinbring,et al.  What Makes a Sign a Mathematical Sign? – An Epistemological Perspective on Mathematical Interaction , 2006 .

[12]  L. Radford.  Gestures, Speech, and the Sprouting of Signs: A Semiotic-Cultural Approach to Students' Types of Generalization , 2003 .

[13]  Claude Janvier.  Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics , 1987 .

[14]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Grounding Cognition: Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking , 2005 .

[15]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[16]  M. Alibali,et al.  Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture , 2000 .

[17]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[18]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[19]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[20]  Caroline Bardini,et al.  On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: A semiotic-cultural perspective on mathematical thinking , 2005 .

[21]  R. Gibbs.  Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[22]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[23]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Math in motion: Using CBRs to enact functions , 2005 .

[24]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[25]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where Mathematics Comes From , 2000 .

[27]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[28]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Learning to See: Making Sense of the Mathematics of Change in Middle School , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[29]  Ornella Robutti,et al.  Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Tools , 2004 .

[30]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Body Motion and Graphing , 1998 .

[31]  Michal Yerushalmy.  Mathematizing Verbal Descriptions of Situations: A Language to Support Modeling , 1997 .