Modelling Childbirth: Comparing Athlete and Non-athlete Pelvic Floor Mechanics

There is preliminary evidence that athletes involved in high-intensity sports for sustained periods have a higher probability of experiencing a prolonged second stage of labour compared to non-athletes. The mechanisms responsible for these differences are not clear, although it is postulated that muscle hypertrophy and increased muscle tone in athletes may contribute to difficulties in vaginal delivery. In order to test these hypotheses, we have constructed individual-specific finite element models of the female pelvic floor (one athlete and one non-athlete) and the fetal head to simulate vaginal delivery and enable quantitative analysis of the differences. The motion of the fetal head descending through the pelvic floor was modelled using finite deformation elasticity with contact mechanics. The force required to push the head was compared between the models and a 45% increase in peak force was observed in the athlete model compared to the non-athlete. In both cases, the overall maximum stretch was induced at the muscle insertions to the pubis. This is the beginning of a quantitative modelling framework that is intended to help clinicians assess the risk of natural versus caesarean birth by taking into account the possible mechanical response of pelvic floor muscles based on their size and activation patterns prior to labour.

[1]  Martin Berzins,et al.  Computational simulation of penetrating trauma in biological soft tissues using the material point method. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  W. Herzog Skeletal muscle mechanics: from mechanisms to function , 2001 .

[3]  Martyn P. Nash,et al.  Modelling the pelvic floor for investigating difficulties during childbirth , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  B. Sweet Mayes' midwifery: A textbook for midwives , 1976 .

[5]  B. Murphy,et al.  Pelvic Floor Function in Nulliparous Women Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  P. Wriggers,et al.  A method for solving contact problems , 1998 .

[8]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Computational Contact Mechanics , 2002 .

[9]  James A. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Levator Ani Muscle Stretch Induced by Simulated Vaginal Birth , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Creating and simulating skeletal muscle from the visible human data set , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  T Mascarenhas,et al.  Finite Element Studies of the Deformation of the Pelvic Floor , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R W Prager,et al.  Fetal head moulding: finite element analysis of a fetal skull subjected to uterine pressures during the first stage of labour. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Amitava Majumdar,et al.  Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Su-Lin Lee,et al.  Subject Specific Finite Element Modelling of the Levator Ani , 2005, MICCAI.