A multi-criteria assessment of six energy conversion processes for H2 production

Abstract The study of Very Large Complex systems (“VLCS”), of which modern energy conversion systems are an important subset, requires a holistic approach to analyze the system itself and all of its “external” and “internal” interactions. The view taken in this paper is that the VLCS should be considered as an “extended” (in a sense specified below) thermodynamic system. The evaluation of the flows of matter and energy sustaining a VLCS and the knowledge of the transformations therein can be used to describe the rate of exploitation of the available natural resources, to assess the efficiency of the conversion process, and to provide a quantitative estimate of the impact of the system on the environment. This kind of information is an important part of the essential database of any Decision Support System for both the internal and global policy planning and for resources management. Several assessment methods are in use at present, and each one of them provides a different insight in the “performance” of the conversion chain under examination. This paper presents the results of a multi-criteria comparative analysis of both conventional and innovative hydrogen production processes in which H2 is generated from different feedstocks: methane, residual oil and biomass (wood chips).

[1]  A. L. Ortíz,et al.  Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process , 1999 .

[2]  Mohammad Asadullah,et al.  Demonstration of real biomass gasification drastically promoted by effective catalyst , 2003 .

[3]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[4]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Thermal design and optimization , 1995 .

[5]  Mohammad Asadullah,et al.  A comparison of Rh/CeO2/SiO2 catalysts with steam reforming catalysts, dolomite and inert materials as bed materials in low throughput fluidized bed gasification systems. , 2004 .

[6]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[7]  S. Kolaczkowski,et al.  Evaluation of thermodynamically favourable operating conditions for production of hydrogen in three different reforming technologies , 2002 .

[8]  Nazim Muradov,et al.  Hydrogen via methane decomposition: an application for decarbonization of fossil fuels , 2001 .

[9]  Meyer Steinberg,et al.  Modern and prospective technologies for hydrogen production from fossil fuels , 1989 .

[10]  Mohammad Asadullah,et al.  Biomass Gasification to Hydrogen and Syngas at Low Temperature: Novel Catalytic System Using Fluidized-Bed Reactor , 2002 .

[11]  E. Sciubba.  Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of Extended Exergy Accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems , 2001 .

[12]  André Faaij,et al.  Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass , 2002 .

[13]  Yehia M. El-Sayed,et al.  The Thermoeconomics of Energy Conversions , 2003 .

[14]  Mohammad Asadullah,et al.  Gasification of different biomasses in a dual-bed gasifier system combined with novel catalysts with high energy efficiency , 2004 .

[15]  J. Fierro,et al.  New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production , 1996 .

[16]  M. Krumpelt,et al.  Hydrogen from hydrocarbon fuels for fuel cells , 2001 .